Does a violation of 8 USC 1324 subject the defendant to forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 981
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
A violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 can and explicitly does subject certain property to forfeiture, because the statute authorizes seizure and forfeiture of conveyances, gross proceeds, and traceable property and directs that such forfeitures be governed by chapter 46 of Title 18, which includes 18 U.S.C. § 981 (civil forfeiture) [1] [2]. The practical effect is that property tied to an alien‑smuggling offense is amenable to civil forfeiture procedures under § 981, though the statutory language focuses on conveyances and proceeds rather than a generic automatic criminal money judgment against every convicted defendant [3] [4].
1. Statutory text: 8 U.S.C. § 1324 ties forfeiture to chapter 46 of Title 18
The text of § 1324(b) makes forfeiture an explicit remedy: “Any conveyance… used in the commission of a violation of subsection (a), the gross proceeds of such violation, and any property traceable to such conveyance or proceeds, shall be seized and subject to forfeiture,” and then directs that “Seizures and forfeitures under this subsection shall be governed by the provisions of chapter 46 of title 18 relating to civil forfeitures, including section 981(d)” [1] [2] [3]. Multiple official codifications and secondary legal publishers reproduce the same cross‑reference tying § 1324 forfeiture authority to the civil forfeiture regime codified in Title 18 [5] [6] [7].
2. What 18 U.S.C. § 981 covers and how it plugs in
Section 981 is the principal civil forfeiture statute and defines the procedures and scope for property “subject to forfeiture to the United States,” including venue and the meaning of “proceeds” and traceable property in many unlawful‑activity contexts [4] [8]. The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 amended § 981 and related provisions and those amendments are expressly incorporated by reference in the notes to § 1324, signaling that forfeiture under § 1324 follows the post‑2000 civil forfeiture framework [4] [8] [9].
3. Practical reading: conveyances, proceeds, traceable property—not every asset of a defendant
Reading § 1324 together with § 981 indicates the government’s forfeiture target is property connected to the alien‑smuggling offense—conveyances used to move aliens, gross proceeds of the unlawful activity, and property traceable to those proceeds [1] [3]. The statutory structure points to civil forfeiture of specific property interests rather than an across‑the‑board criminal money judgment under some other forfeiture provisions; § 1324’s text and the cross‑reference to chapter 46 frame forfeiture in the traditional civil‑forfeiture mold [1] [4].
4. Procedural consequences and statutory nuances reflected in official materials
Official Justice Department materials and statutory annotations reiterate that § 1324 includes seizure and forfeiture language and that proceedings are governed by customs and civil‑forfeiture rules as adapted by the Attorney General, including probable‑cause standards for seizure and claimant burdens where a third party asserts ownership [10] [11] [12]. The Justice Manual and related guidance emphasize penalties under § 1324 and reference forfeiture as a significant consequence, consistent with statutory cross‑references [13] [12].
5. Where the record here is silent and what that implies
The provided sources establish the statutory hook: § 1324 authorizes forfeiture and expressly points to chapter 46 and § 981 for procedure and scope [1] [2] [4]. These materials do not, however, supply case law illustrating how courts have applied § 981 in every factual permutation of § 1324 prosecutions, nor do they catalog limits or defenses litigated in particular forfeiture suits; thus, how aggressively a prosecutor proceeds, what defenses succeed, and how courts resolve traceability questions require court decisions and briefs beyond the sources supplied [4] [10].
6. Bottom line
Statutorily, yes: Congress made property used in or traceable to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 subject to seizure and forfeiture and instructed that those forfeitures be governed by chapter 46 of Title 18, including 18 U.S.C. § 981, so civil forfeiture procedures under § 981 apply to the kinds of property § 1324 designates [1] [2] [4]. The precise contours—how § 981’s doctrines (proceeds, traceability, venue, claimant burdens) play out in individual cases—depend on litigation and facts not contained in the reporting assembled here [4] [10].