Which DocumentCloud pages in the DOJ U.S. v. Maxwell flight‑log release show 'Little St. James' as the destination and who is listed on those pages?
Executive summary
The flight‑log bundle released by the Department of Justice in U.S. v. Maxwell was reposted to DocumentCloud as a single 118‑page file, which contains handwritten passenger manifests and destination entries supplied to the Maxwell prosecution [1] [2]. Reporting and the DOJ hosting point to the same set of PDFs and mirrored copies but the supplied sources do not provide a page‑by‑page index from DocumentCloud that maps the exact DocumentCloud page numbers showing “Little St. James” and the names that accompany those entries [3] [1] Epsteinflightlogs_released_in_USA_v.Maxwell.pdf" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[4].
1. What the public releases are and where they live
The DOJ released a packet of flight logs and related exhibits that were entered in the U.S. v. Maxwell case; these are available as a set of government PDFs on DOJ servers and have been mirrored on third‑party hosts including DocumentCloud and Wikimedia Commons [3] [2] [4] [5]. News organizations and aggregators republished or summarized the release, noting that the material comprises nearly 120 pages of handwritten logs and manifests introduced at trial [6] [7].
2. What reporting confirms about entries for Little St. James
Multiple outlets covering the DOJ release discuss destinations and passenger listings in the logs, and observers have long scrutinized trips to Little St. James within Epstein‑related materials; Law & Crime described nearly 120 pages of handwritten flight logs containing detailed passenger lists that were entered into evidence at Maxwell’s trial [6]. The DOJ’s own disclosure portal and coverage around the release confirm the logs include flight manifests and destinations spanning years, but the public DOJ pages cited in the sources do not include a DocumentCloud page index that singles out each “Little St. James” line with an associated list of passengers [3] [8] [2].
3. Why a concise page‑and‑name answer cannot be supplied from the provided sources
The user’s question asks for specific DocumentCloud page numbers and the names listed on those pages; the document links in the reporting point to full PDFs and a DocumentCloud file but none of the supplied sources publish a DocumentCloud page map or a verified, source‑attributed extraction of every “Little St. James” entry with corresponding passenger names that can be cited here [1] [4] [5]. Because the exercise requires exact page citations in the DocumentCloud release, and the provided materials do not include that granular mapping in their snippets or metadata, it is not possible based on the supplied reporting to definitively list the DocumentCloud page numbers and the precise names that appear on them without conducting a fresh textual search of the DocumentCloud file or the DOJ PDFs [1] [3].
4. How to get the precise, citable answer from the primary files
To produce the exact DocumentCloud page numbers and names, a direct search of the DocumentCloud file “Epstein flight logs released in USA vs. Maxwell” or of the DOJ PDFs is required: use the DocumentCloud viewer’s text search for the phrase “Little St. James” inside that 118‑page file [1], or download the DOJ “B. Flight Log_Released in U.S. v. Maxwell” PDFs and perform a keyword search for the same phrase [2] [9] [10]. The Wikimedia Commons mirrors provide additional downloadable copies that can be searched offline if needed [4] [5].
5. Context and caveats about names and reporting
Reporting around the release highlights intense public interest in prominent names in the logs, and some outlets emphasize high‑profile individuals mentioned elsewhere in the corpus, while the DOJ cautioned against unfounded assertions tied to selected entries and noted protective redactions for survivors in parts of the release [11] [7]. Independent summaries (for example Law & Crime) confirm the logs were entered as evidence and contain passenger lists, but such summaries do not substitute for a line‑by‑line primary‑document citation that the present question requires [6].
6. Bottom line for researchers and journalists
The necessary documents are publicly available on DOJ servers and on DocumentCloud/Wikimedia mirrors referenced in the reporting [3] [2] [1] [4]. However, the exact DocumentCloud page numbers listing “Little St. James” and the names on those pages cannot be asserted from the supplied sources alone; a targeted text search of the DocumentCloud viewer or the downloadable DOJ PDFs is the only way to generate the precise, citable page–name pairs demanded by the question [1] [2].