Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
The 34 felony counts against trump
Executive summary
A Manhattan jury convicted Donald Trump in May 2024 on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records tied to hush‑money payments related to Stormy Daniels; the conviction and later sentencing developments left him a convicted felon on paper but without jail time after a January 2025 unconditional discharge [1] [2]. Multiple outlets report Trump has appealed and sought to overturn the verdict, and the U.S. Justice Department has even filed a brief supporting arguments to throw out the conviction — highlighting legal complexity and competing views about presidential immunity and consequences [3] [4] [5].
1. What the 34 counts were and why they mattered
Prosecutors in Manhattan charged Trump with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the first degree; each count corresponded to a specific business document dated between February and December 2017 and related to reimbursements and bookkeeping for payments intended to conceal a $420,000 hush‑money scheme involving Stormy Daniels, the payment chain, and related invoicing and reimbursement entries [1]. Conviction on those counts was historically significant because it made Trump the first former U.S. president convicted of felony charges after his time in office, a legal and political milestone reported across major outlets [1] [6].
2. The trial outcome: guilty verdict, then no punishment
A Manhattan jury found Trump guilty on all 34 counts in May 2024; courts later held sentencing proceedings in January 2025 that resulted in an unconditional discharge — a sentence that confirms the felony convictions but imposes no jail time, fines, probation, or other penalties, a rare post‑conviction outcome that some outlets described as “avoiding punishment” despite the guilty verdict [2] [6]. Reporting notes that, even with the discharge, the conviction remains on the record unless overturned on appeal [2] [3].
3. Appeals and legal arguments — immunity and evidentiary disputes
Trump’s legal team has pursued appeals challenging the conviction, arguing among other things that evidence about official acts as president was improperly admitted and invoking immunities emphasized in subsequent Supreme Court decisions; outlets summarize these appellate arguments and note that courts are reviewing whether trial errors or immunity claims warrant overturning the verdict [5] [3]. The Justice Department’s unusual position — filing a friend‑of‑the‑court brief urging that the hush‑money conviction be thrown out — adds a significant federal voice aligned with arguments favoring reversal, illustrating competing legal interpretations of immunity and prosecutorial scope [4].
4. Political and practical consequences: record vs. penalties
Coverage highlights a split between symbolic and practical consequences: Trump remains a convicted felon on the record unless an appellate court vacates the verdict, yet his reelection and the January discharge meant he faced few immediate personal penalties from the conviction — a distinction reporters stress when assessing the consequences of the 34 counts [3] [2]. That split fuels political debate: critics point to the conviction as proof of criminal wrongdoing, while supporters emphasize the lack of punishment and pending appeals as evidence the case is unsettled [6] [5].
5. How reporters are framing competing narratives
Mainstream outlets and legal reporters frame two competing narratives: one emphasizes the judicial process that produced the guilty verdict and the historic nature of convicting a former president; the other underscores legal procedural complexities, post‑conviction relief (the discharge), and ongoing appeals that could erase the conviction — a dual frame seen in Reuters, Politico, Axios and others covering the aftermath and appellate posture [7] [3] [5] [4].
6. What current sources do not settle (key open questions)
Available sources do not mention final appellate resolution as of the dates in these items — for example, whether higher courts have conclusively ruled to uphold or reverse the conviction, nor do they provide a definitive answer on long‑term political or professional disqualifications tied to a state conviction under the specific circumstances reported here [3] [4]. Sources also do not uniformly resolve factual disputes about the precise intent behind specific bookkeeping entries beyond the prosecution’s theory reflected in the indictment [1].
7. Bottom line for readers
The “34 felony counts” refer to state charges of falsifying business records tied to a hush‑money scheme; a jury convicted Trump on all counts in May 2024, but a January 2025 unconditional discharge left him with the conviction on record but no punishment — and the matter remains contested through appeals and high‑profile legal briefs, meaning the legal status and broader consequences are still in flux [1] [2] [3] [4].