Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Is trump a rapist?

Checked on November 14, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Multiple women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct, including at least one civil finding that he sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll; juries in that case found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation but not for rape under New York’s statutory definition [1] [2] [3]. Other plaintiffs and reporting have used terms ranging from “attempted rape” to “rape” in describing allegations (e.g., Jill Harth, Ivana Trump, an anonymous “Jane Doe”), but available sources show Trump has not been criminally convicted of rape and he denies all allegations [4] [5] [6].

1. A tangle of accusations, civil findings, and criminal silence

Since the 1970s, reporting and timelines compiled by outlets such as The Guardian and Wikipedia document dozens of women who have accused Trump of misconduct that includes groping, kissing without consent, and allegations described by some accusers as rape or attempted rape [1] [5]. The most legally consequential episode in public record is E. Jean Carroll’s civil suits. A jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and awarded damages; the jury explicitly did not find him civilly liable for rape under New York law’s specific definition [2] [3] [7].

2. What “rape” means in reporting vs. in court

Media accounts and some accusers have used the word “rape” when recounting incidents; for example, Ivana Trump reportedly used the term in a 1990s context before later softening that description, and other reporting attributes “rape” wording to certain lawsuits and books [5] [1]. But courts apply statutory definitions and evidence standards: in Carroll’s case, jurors found sexual abuse liability but rejected the rape finding as defined under New York’s penal law [2] [7]. Available sources do not show any criminal conviction of Trump for rape [6].

3. Civil verdicts, damages, and ongoing appeals

Carroll’s civil verdict resulted in an initial $5 million award in 2023 and later additional damages in related proceedings; Trump has sought appellate and Supreme Court review of the judgment, calling the allegations “facially implausible” and disputing evidentiary rulings that allowed other-acts testimony [3] [8]. The Second Circuit previously upheld aspects of the trial judge’s discretion to admit propensity evidence; Trump continues to challenge the rulings [8] [9].

4. Other named allegations and their legal outcomes

Several other women named in reporting alleged forcible behavior; Jill Harth described “attempted rape” in a 1997 complaint but later settled or dropped parts of cases; a “Jane Doe” plaintiff has filed and at times refiled suits alleging rape involving Jeffrey Epstein’s parties, with lawsuits subject to withdrawal or dismissal in some filings [4] [10]. News outlets summarize dozens of accusations ranging from groping to claims of rape, but the reporting shows a mix of civil suits, media statements, and withdrawn claims rather than criminal convictions [6] [11].

5. Disagreement and political context in coverage

Legal findings and language have been contested: some advocates and legal commentators present the Carroll verdict as proof Trump sexually assaulted a woman [9], while Trump and his lawyers characterize the claims as politically motivated falsehoods and contest evidentiary rulings and verdicts on appeal [7] [8]. Reporting repeatedly notes Trump’s denials and the absence of police charges leading to a criminal conviction in the publicly available record [6] [3].

6. How to interpret “Is Trump a rapist?” given the record

If the question asks whether Trump has been criminally convicted of rape, available sources do not report any criminal conviction for rape; they instead show civil litigation, a civil finding of sexual abuse in Carroll’s case, and many unproven or withdrawn allegations [3] [2] [6]. If the question asks whether accusers have called incidents “rape,” several have used that term or described forcible acts — but courts and juries have reached different legal conclusions depending on claims, evidence, definitions, and procedural rules [5] [2] [9].

7. Limitations, unanswered questions, and where reporting diverges

Available sources in this packet focus on prominent civil cases and media timelines; they do not present a comprehensive criminal-investigation record for every allegation and do not establish guilt beyond the standards of criminal law [1] [11]. Some accounts rely on civil testimony, withdrawn suits, or memoirs; others analyze the significance of propensity evidence admitted at trial [9]. Readers should weigh the difference between civil liability, criminal conviction, and public allegations when assessing the underlying question [3] [2].

Bottom line: reporting and court records show multiple allegations and one civil finding of sexual abuse (E. Jean Carroll), but no criminal rape conviction; competing narratives exist — accusers and their advocates assert serious wrongdoing while Trump consistently denies the claims and continues to pursue appeals [3] [8] [9].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the key allegations and legal cases accusing Donald Trump of sexual assault or rape?
What evidence and testimony were presented in the E. Jean Carroll trials and appeals involving Trump?
How have courts ruled on Trump’s liability in civil sexual misconduct suits and what precedents apply?
What criminal investigations into Donald Trump’s alleged sexual offenses have been opened, closed, or declined and why?
How do statutes of limitations, presidential immunity claims, and defamation law affect prosecution or civil liability for sexual assault allegations?