Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has Donald Trump faced convictions in other legal cases like Georgia or federal?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump has a state felony conviction in New York — a May 2024 verdict finding him guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records — and that conviction is under appeal [1] [2]. He has not been convicted in the Fulton County, Georgia racketeering case, where he and co-defendants were indicted and several co‑defendants later pleaded guilty, nor in the broader federal election obstruction prosecutions, which Special Counsel Jack Smith ultimately dropped [3] [4]. These are the settled factual milestones: a confirmed New York conviction with ongoing appeals, pending prosecutions in Georgia with co‑defendant pleas, and dropped federal charges. The remaining disputes are procedural and appellate: defendants seek to move or overturn outcomes, and the Georgia case remains active without a Trump conviction to date [5] [6].
1. A historic New York conviction — what actually happened and what it means now
In May 2024, a New York court delivered a criminal conviction against Donald Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records tied to alleged hush‑money payments; he became the first former U.S. president to be convicted of felony charges in a state criminal proceeding [1] [2]. The conviction carried sentencing scheduled shortly thereafter and has triggered immediate appellate litigation, including efforts by Trump’s team to raise presidential immunity claims and to shift proceedings into federal courts. The conviction remains intact unless and until an appellate court overturns it; in the meantime it is a confirmed legal fact that differentiates the New York case from the other prosecutions that either remain pending or were dismissed [5].
2. Georgia’s racketeering indictment — charges, co‑defendants, and the current status
Fulton County prosecutors brought a sweeping racketeering indictment against Trump and 18 others alleging an extensive conspiracy to overturn the 2020 Georgia election results, invoking RICO and listing numerous acts in support of the alleged scheme [3]. Several co‑defendants, including lawyers and operatives, later entered pleas or plea agreements and received sentences such as probation, but Trump himself pleaded not guilty and has not been convicted in Georgia; the case remains pending litigation and pretrial maneuvering [3] [6]. The presence of co‑defendant pleas provides prosecutorial leverage and factual admissions for prosecutors, but pleas by others are not convictions of Trump and do not legally determine his guilt in the Georgia matter.
3. Federal election obstruction prosecutions — indictments raised, resolutions reached
Federal indictments charging election‑related offenses were brought under a Special Counsel; these federal cases included counts such as conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and related charges [7]. According to later developments, Special Counsel Jack Smith ultimately dropped the federal criminal cases before trial, meaning Trump was not convicted in those federal matters and the government chose not to pursue verdicts in that forum [4]. The dismissal of federal charges is a decisive outcome: it distinguishes the federal track from the New York state conviction and leaves the federal avenue closed unless the Department of Justice or another prosecutor resurrects different charges under lawful authority [4].
4. Legal tactics, appeals, and procedural fights that shape outcomes
Following the New York conviction, Trump’s legal team pursued aggressive appeals and procedural arguments seeking to move or vacate the state conviction on immunity and venue grounds; a federal appeals court ordered re‑examination of some procedural questions, illustrating ongoing legal contestation [5]. In Georgia, defenses include challenges to indictment scope and evidentiary issues, while in federal matters the government’s decision to dismiss ended active prosecution but not public debate. These procedural battles are consequential: outcomes can change on appeal, and legal toolsets—venue transfers, immunity claims, plea bargaining by co‑defendants—shape ultimate accountability even when convictions are absent or vacated [5] [6].
5. Putting the pieces together — how to read the mosaic of convictions, charges, and dismissals
The factual mosaic is clear: one state felony conviction in New York (under appeal); no convictions in Georgia (case pending) and none in federal prosecutions (those were dropped) [1] [3] [4]. Co‑defendant pleas in Georgia supply prosecutorial evidence but are legally distinct from a conviction of Trump. Public narratives that conflate co‑defendant pleas, indictments, and prosecutorial filings with convictions misstate the record; conversely, claims that Trump has no legal consequences overlook the confirmed New York conviction. Readers should track appellate rulings and prosecutorial decisions, as the legal landscape can change, but as of the latest consolidated reporting the New York verdict stands alone as the only conviction among these high‑profile matters [1] [4].