Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many criminal charges has Donald Trump faced since 2020 and how do they differ from civil cases?
Executive summary
As of the sources provided, reporting counted four separate criminal cases filed against Donald Trump since 2023 (two federal, two state) that together produced dozens of individual criminal counts — commonly summarized as roughly 80–90 charges across those cases (for example, CREW counted 88 charges as of March 2024) [1]. The criminal matters are distinct from civil suits: criminal cases can carry prison time and are prosecuted by the government, while civil cases seek money or injunctive relief and are private-party or government civil actions (available sources do not provide a single statutory definition but describe criminal indictments, counts and convictions vs. civil judgments) [1] [2].
1. Four criminal prosecutions, many individual counts — how reporting frames the tally
News outlets and trackers describe Trump as facing four criminal prosecutions that arose in 2023–2024: two federal cases (the Jan. 6 election-interference indictment and the classified-documents indictment) and two state cases (the Manhattan “hush‑money” falsified‑records prosecution and the Fulton County, Georgia, election‑interference case) [3] [2] [4]. Independent trackers and watchdogs added up the individual counts across those four matters to produce headline totals: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) reported 88 criminal offenses as of March 2024 [1], while other outlets and compilations list similar consolidated counts and note that the federal Jan. 6 indictment includes four counts and that state and federal indictments include many more individual counts [5] [2].
2. Why totals vary: indictments, superseding indictments, dismissals and convictions
Totals change because an “indictment” is a list of charges which can be superseded, amended, or partially dismissed, and because convictions remove some counts from “pending” status. For example, the New York case produced 34 counts of falsifying business records that led to a guilty verdict on all 34 counts in May 2024 [2]. The Georgia indictment initially charged Trump with 13 counts but judges later struck or dismissed several counts, changing that case’s count total [6] [7]. CREW’s 88‑count figure aggregated counts across the four active criminal cases at a specific moment [1]; other compendia (Wikipedia, BBC, Ballotpedia, FRONTLINE) report the underlying indictments’ different counts and legal theories [2] [5] [7] [3].
3. The legal difference: criminal charges vs. civil cases (how sources describe the stakes)
Sources make the basic distinctions clear in practice: criminal prosecutions allege violations of criminal statutes and expose defendants to potential fines and imprisonment if convicted — for instance, some individual criminal counts in the indictments carry multi‑year potential prison terms [5] [8]. Civil cases, by contrast, are generally private lawsuits seeking monetary damages or injunctive relief; sources point to civil judgments against Trump such as the E. Jean Carroll defamation/sexual‑assault-related civil judgment as a separate track from criminal indictments (available sources do not include an extended statutory primer, but they treat civil judgments and criminal indictments as separate legal mechanisms) [9].
4. Where things stood and why the calendar matters
Reporting emphasizes that the posture of cases changes with appeals, dismissals, sentencing and political developments. Trump’s New York conviction produced sentencing and appeals [10], federal indictments were revised following a Supreme Court immunity ruling [5] [3], and some federal charges were described as dismissed in later reporting after electoral outcomes [11] — illustrating how procedural events alter who “faces” which charges at any given time. CREW’s snapshot and other guides capture counts at particular dates, which is why contemporaneous totals can diverge [1] [3].
5. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the coverage
Accounting sources come from different vantage points: watchdog groups like CREW aggregate counts to emphasize the sheer volume of criminal exposure [1]; mainstream outlets such as BBC, PBS/FRONTLINE and Reuters frame the individual indictments, their legal theories and potential penalties [5] [3] [12]; other organizations and press accounts note procedural victories or setbacks (appeals courts, dismissals) that counsel caution about fixed tallies [13] [11]. Each source’s emphasis can reflect an agenda — for example, watchdog tallies stress accountability while legal guides emphasize nuance about charges and immunity rulings — so readers should treat aggregate counts as snapshots rather than immutable facts [1] [5].
6. Bottom line for readers: interpreting “how many” and “how different”
If the question is “how many criminal charges,” sources commonly point to dozens of individual counts aggregated across four criminal prosecutions — CREW cited 88 as of March 2024 — but court rulings, convictions, dismissals and superseding indictments mean any single number can change [1] [2]. If the question is “how do criminal charges differ from civil cases,” the reporting shows they are procedurally and substantively distinct: criminal cases are government prosecutions that can produce prison and fines, while civil cases resolve private claims for money or remedies and follow different proof rules [5] [9]. Available sources do not provide a unified statutory checklist in one place but collectively describe the practical differences and the evolving counts across cases [1] [3].