Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has Donald Trump been convicted on other felony charges besides the hush money case?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump has one confirmed felony conviction: 34 counts of first-degree falsifying business records in the New York “hush money” case; sentencing and appeals followed that verdict [1] [2]. Multiple other criminal indictments exist across federal and state jurisdictions, but as of the sources provided those other matters are charged or pending, not resulting in additional felony convictions [3] [4].
1. What the record shows — the single confirmed conviction that changed precedent
The most concrete, adjudicated outcome in the materials is the New York state conviction, where a jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records tied to payments related to Stormy Daniels. That verdict is repeatedly documented across the analyses and summaries supplied, and is treated as the established conviction in those sources [1] [2]. The reporting notes scheduling of sentencing and the immediate filing of appeals; one source frames the conviction as historic because it produced the first felony conviction of a former U.S. president [5]. This conviction is the only one the provided materials identify as final, with other matters described as indictments, pending trials, or appeals [1] [4].
2. Other criminal matters: indictments, charges and where they stand
The materials catalog multiple other criminal prosecutions against Trump across jurisdictions — federal and state — that include allegations such as willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and state racketeering and election-related charges in Georgia. These pieces present those matters as active prosecutions or indictments, not convictions; they emphasize that Trump has pleaded not guilty and that proceedings, trials, or pretrial appeals remain ongoing [3] [6] [4]. The distinction between indictment and conviction is central in the sources: indictments initiate criminal liability claims, but they do not establish guilt absent a trial verdict or plea that results in conviction.
3. Conflicting or ambiguous reporting in supplied analyses — where wording may mislead
Some analyses in the packet repeat the New York conviction but also include phrasing that could be read to imply additional convictions or settled outcomes in other cases, such as references to sentencing dates or to convictions in “a separate case” without clear attribution [7]. This creates possible confusion: the documented conviction remains the New York falsifying-business-records verdict, while references to other convictions are either absent, lack corroborating detail, or come from interpretations rather than court judgments in the provided materials [8] [9]. The materials contain both explicit confirmation of the New York conviction and summaries of other charges that remain unresolved.
4. Appeals and legal maneuvering that affect finality and public understanding
The sources note vigorous appellate activity and immunity arguments that have influenced litigation timelines, with at least one appeals court ordering review or staying aspects of proceedings tied to claims of presidential immunity [8] [9]. Appeals and interlocutory rulings can alter the legal landscape—affecting sentencing schedules, trial dates, or even the viability of charges—so the single confirmed conviction in New York does not mean the legal saga is static. The supplied coverage underscores that appeals may delay enforcement and that legal outcomes can shift as higher courts intervene [8].
5. Multiple perspectives and organizational framings in the materials
The packet includes summaries from different outlets and compendia that vary in emphasis: some outlets foreground the historic nature of the New York verdict [5], while advocacy-oriented collections catalogue the breadth of charges across jurisdictions [3]. These differing emphases reflect potential agendas: one presentation may stress the singular historic conviction, another may highlight the sheer number of pending charges to convey a broader narrative of legal jeopardy. The supplied analyses therefore require careful parsing to distinguish confirmed judicial outcomes from ongoing allegations.
6. Bottom line and what to watch next in the cases
Based on the materials provided, the only established felony conviction is the 34-count New York falsifying-business-records verdict, with sentencing and appeals documented [1] [2]. All other cited matters across federal and state dockets are indictments, pending trials, or appealed rulings rather than concluded convictions [3] [4]. Key near-term indicators to monitor in the sources would be final appellate decisions, sentencing implementation dates, and trial outcomes in the other jurisdictions; until those produce guilty verdicts or plea convictions, they remain unresolved allegations in the supplied record [8] [9].