Has Donald Trump been charged or convicted of any sex crimes?

1. What the key public claims assert — liability vs. criminal guilt

Public statements and reporting advance two distinct claims: first, that Donald Trump has been legally found responsible for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll; second, that he has been criminally charged or convicted of a sex crime. The factual record in the provided sources supports the first claim as a civil finding of liability—a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and ordered damages ^{[5] [2]}. The second claim—criminal charges or convictions for a sex crime—lacks support in these materials: the cases cited are civil, and reporting explicitly notes no criminal sex‑crime convictions or charges tied to these allegations in the documents supplied ^{[2] [6]}. This distinction is central to understanding the legal status and public discourse.

2. The civil findings against Trump: what courts actually concluded

Federal juries and appeals courts have concluded that Trump was liable to E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and for defaming her, awarding $5 million on the abuse/defamation verdict and larger damages in a related defamation claim; an $83.3 million penalty has been upheld in part by a U.S. court ruling ^{[1] [2] [7] [5]}. The courts described the conduct as battery and sexual abuse, with some judicial commentary noting that a judge later said the facts aligned with the common definition of rape even though the jury did not return a statutory rape verdict under New York law for forcible penetration ^{[8] [7]}. These findings were made under the lower preponderance-of-evidence standard that governs civil trials, not the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard required for criminal convictions ^[2].

3. Criminal convictions that are often conflated with sex‑crime allegations

Separate from the Carroll litigation, prosecutors obtained a criminal conviction against Trump for 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a reimbursement tied to a hush‑money payment to Stormy Daniels; that conviction concerns financial records, not a sex crime ^{[3] [4]}. Reporting on indictments and convictions stresses that these charges were about record-keeping and campaign-related concealment, not statutory sexual offenses, and that the Daniels allegation underlies the financial conduct allegations rather than producing a criminal sex‑offense charge against Trump ^{[6] [4]}. Conflation in public discourse between the underlying allegations of sexual encounters and the criminal counts about bookkeeping contributes to confusion.

4. Legal mechanics that explain why outcomes differ across cases

Civil courts apply the preponderance-of-evidence standard, which led juries to find Trump liable in Carroll’s case, while criminal courts require proof beyond a reasonable doubt and statutory elements that were not charged in these matters ^{[2] [5]}. Appeals courts have upheld civil findings and some monetary awards, with ongoing appeals noted in the sources; the sustained penalties underscore how civil liability can carry large financial consequences even where there is no criminal conviction ^{[1] [7]}. The jury’s refusal to find rape under the specific New York statutory definition used at trial while judges or commentators describe the conduct differently shows how legal definitions and procedural rules shape outcomes as much as fact-finding.

5. Competing narratives, interests, and what's left unsettled

Different actors advance different narratives: Carroll and her legal team frame the rulings as vindication and an accountability mechanism, while Trump and his defenders emphasize appeals and the lack of criminal convictions, framing civil findings as insufficient to prove criminal guilt ^{[8] [2]}. Media accounts and political opponents may conflate civil liability with criminal conviction to highlight misconduct, while supporters emphasize procedural protections and the higher burden in criminal law; both narratives reflect understandable institutional incentives. Ongoing appeals and separate unresolved allegations mean the public record is still evolving, but on the specific question of whether Trump has been charged or convicted of a sex crime, the provided materials are clear: civil liability exists; criminal sex‑crime charges or convictions do not appear in these sources ^{[2] [6]}.