Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the major sexual assault and misconduct allegations against Donald J. Trump and when were they filed?
Executive Summary
The record shows dozens of women have publicly accused Donald J. Trump of sexual assault, non-consensual touching, and unwanted advances spanning from the 1970s through the 2010s, with allegations disclosed in media reports, civil suits, and at least one civil jury finding. The most consequential legal outcome to date is a May 2023 New York civil verdict that found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming columnist E. Jean Carroll under the New York Adult Survivors Act; Trump denies all accusations and has characterized legal rulings as politically motivated [1] [2] [3]. This analysis extracts the principal claims reported, maps when allegations were publicly filed or litigated, and compares major factual findings and competing narratives across the available sources, highlighting where claims overlap, where evidence differs, and which matters produced legal judgments versus unproven allegations [4] [5].
1. A scattering of allegations across decades that paint a persistent pattern
Reporting assembled by major outlets catalogs numerous allegations from more than 16 to at least 26 women, with claim dates described as early as the 1970s and continuing through the 1990s and into the 2010s. Individual accusations include descriptions of groping on airplanes, forcible kissing in social settings, unwanted touching in dressing rooms, and allegations of rape or attempted rape, depending on the account [4] [3] [6]. The sources show consistent public disclosure spikes around Trump’s 2015–2016 presidential campaign and during later legal windows such as New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed older claims to be litigated civilly; that legislative window directly enabled E. Jean Carroll’s successful civil claim filed under that law [6] [1]. The volume and similarity of many accounts are presented by reporters as indicative of a pattern, although most allegations did not result in criminal convictions.
2. The E. Jean Carroll civil case: the most significant legal finding
E. Jean Carroll’s civil lawsuit culminated in a May 2023 jury finding that Trump was liable for sexually abusing and defaming her, awarding damages and establishing a legal determination in civil court distinct from criminal guilt. The jury’s finding described sexual abuse in the sense of unwanted touching rather than using the criminal label of rape; the verdict relied on testimony and the New York Adult Survivors Act’s civil window, and it produced a monetary award of about $5 million [1]. Sources frame this outcome as the first time a jury formally found a former U.S. president civilly liable for sexual abuse, and journalists note the verdict’s potential to encourage other civil suits, even as appeals and political reactions continued [1] [2]. Trump denied the allegation and vowed appeals, and the legal status remains civil liability rather than criminal conviction.
3. High-profile accusers and when their claims were made public or filed
Notable accusers appearing across reports include Jessica Leeds (airplane groping), Natasha Stoynoff (Mar-a-Lago encounter), Temple Taggart (1997 forced kiss), Jill Harth (alleged groping), Summer Zervos (defamation suit related to 2016 denials), and Ivana Trump (alleged nonconsensual sex in 1989), among many others whose accounts surfaced in press interviews or in legal filings [4] [3] [6]. The public timing varies: many women first went public during the 2016 campaign, while some claims were later pursued in civil court or in books and investigative reports; the Carroll civil suit was filed under a 2022 NY statute that created a temporary window for older abuse claims, leading to the 2023 trial [6] [1]. Claims are thus a mix of contemporaneous media disclosures and post-hoc civil filings enabled by changing legal opportunities.
4. Evidence, corroboration, and legal thresholds differ across matters
Sources emphasize that the evidentiary standards and outcomes vary: journalistic compilations rest on interviews, contemporaneous accounts, corroborating witnesses, and patterns of statements, while courts apply civil or criminal standards and evidentiary rules. The Carroll jury applied a preponderance-of-evidence civil standard and found abuse and defamation; other accusations remain unproven in court, reported only in media accounts or civil complaints without verdicts [1] [3]. Reporting also notes corroboration in some instances—witness statements or contemporaneous records—but many cases depend on conflicting testimonies and denials, and Trump has uniformly called the allegations false and politically motivated [4] [2]. Public perception and legal consequence therefore diverge across the portfolio of allegations.
5. Political context, media compilations, and unresolved questions
Journalists and commentators use compilations and recent books to argue a consistent behavioral pattern, while defenders stress lack of criminal convictions and challenge motives and timing; major reporting highlights both the scale of accusations and the legal limits of proving criminal wrongdoing decades after alleged events [4] [5] [2]. The Carroll verdict added a legally binding finding on one allegation, but many other accusations remain adjudicated only in the court of public opinion, creating a split between documented civil liability in one case and unresolved allegations elsewhere. The available sources underscore key open questions: the number of credibly corroborated claims, the extent to which legal windows allow litigation of historic allegations, and how courts will handle appeals and new suits arising from books or investigative disclosures [1] [3].