Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific sexual misconduct allegations have been made against Donald Trump and who are the accusers?
Executive summary
Multiple news organizations and compilations say more than two dozen women have publicly accused Donald Trump over decades of unwanted kissing, groping, and in some cases forcible sexual assault or rape; E. Jean Carroll’s 2019 allegation that he raped her in the mid-1990s is among the most legally consequential (reports list at least 25–28 accusers) [1] [2] [3]. Reporting also ties Trump by association to Jeffrey Epstein-era accusations and newly released Epstein-related documents that Democrats say raise questions about what Trump knew [4] [5].
1. A catalogue of allegations: who accused him and when
News outlets and compiled timelines list dozens of accusers across decades — many accounts emerged in waves around Trump’s 2016 and 2020 campaigns — with allegations ranging from unsolicited kissing and groping to claims of rape; sources report “at least 25–28” women have come forward publicly [1] [2] [3]. PBS’s 2019 recap summarizes early accusations and a set of incidents and named women, including a mix of models, pageant contestants and others who allege unwanted touching or more aggressive assaults [6].
2. Notable individual allegations that shaped coverage
E. Jean Carroll publicly accused Trump in 2019 of raping her in a department‑store dressing room in 1995 or 1996; her claim became central to a civil case and extensive coverage [1]. Other widely cited accounts chronicled in timeline reporting include models and pageant contestants who described groping or forced kissing in the 1980s and 1990s [2] [6].
3. Legal filings, lawsuits and outcomes
Some accusers pursued civil suits or public legal notices; for example, a plaintiff identified in reporting as “Jane Doe” or “Katie Johnson” filed and later dismissed a claim alleging sex crimes with Epstein and Trump dating to the 1990s, a case that drew renewed attention online when court documents resurfaced [7] [6]. Sources note legal activity has been uneven: some suits were dropped or settled, others proceeded to trials or appeals, and compilations underline that Trump has consistently denied the allegations [3] [6].
4. The Epstein connection and new document disclosures
Reporting from The Washington Post and Reuters highlights newly released emails and documents from the Jeffrey Epstein archive that Democrats say suggest Trump “knew about” Epstein’s abuse of underage girls, though an article attributes to Epstein the line that Trump “knew about the sexual abuse … but never participated”; these documents have intensified scrutiny of Trump’s ties to Epstein [4] [5]. Republican releases of Epstein-related material likewise include references to Trump’s name in varied contexts, sometimes in political or social settings rather than as direct evidence of criminal conduct [5].
5. Patterns in media presentation and political rebuttals
Compilations by outlets such as The Guardian and The 19th describe the allegations as a “pattern” of unwanted conduct; their reporting juxtaposes numerous eyewitness and victim accounts against the Trump camp’s uniform denials that the stories are politically motivated or false [2] [8]. PBS noted that Trump and his campaign called many accounts fabricated and politically timed, especially during election cycles [6].
6. What available reporting does and does not establish
Available reporting documents many public allegations and at least one high‑profile civil case (E. Jean Carroll) and various lawsuits and filings, but sources differ on legal conclusions for individual claims and note a range of outcomes [1] [3]. Available sources do not mention definitive criminal convictions of Trump tied to the majority of these sexual‑misconduct allegations; some civil rulings and appeals are discussed but particulars vary by report [3] [7].
7. How to read these competing narratives
Journalistic compendia present a large number of contemporaneous personal accounts and some corroborating details; Trump’s repeated denials and characterization of allegations as politically motivated are consistent across the coverage [2] [6]. Readers should weigh the volume and consistency of survivor accounts reported by outlets against the legal record and public denials; newly released Epstein-related documents add context but do not, in the sources provided, amount to a full adjudication of every claim [4] [5].
Limitations: this answer summarizes only items present in the provided sources and does not attempt to adjudicate disputed claims; for specifics on each accuser’s statements, dates, and legal actions consult the cited timeline and news articles cited here [1] [2] [6].