Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the names of the women who filed lawsuits against Donald Trump for sexual misconduct?
Executive Summary
Two women named in the provided materials sued or publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct: E. Jean Carroll, who sued for sexual assault and defamation and secured an $83.3 million judgment that was upheld on appeal, and Stacey Williams, who publicly accused Trump of groping her and was reported to have made allegations in 2024. These materials focus heavily on Carroll’s multi‑year litigation and appellate rulings while noting additional accusations that were reported but described differently in the sources (lawsuit versus public accusation) [1] [2].
1. The high‑profile name that led to a major verdict and appeal: who E. Jean Carroll is and what she won
E. Jean Carroll sued Donald Trump claiming he sexually assaulted her and later defamed her by denying the allegation; a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation and set damages at $83.3 million, a judgment repeatedly discussed and upheld on appeal in September 2025 according to these materials [1] [3] [4]. The reporting underscores that Carroll’s case traversed trial and appeals courts, producing a rare large monetary award against a former president; the appellate decisions rejected arguments that presidential immunity shielded Trump from liability in this context [1] [5].
2. The legal character of Carroll’s claims and what courts decided
Carroll’s filings encompassed both a substantive allegation of sexual assault (dating to the 1990s in reporting) and defamation claims tied to Trump’s public statements denying her account. Courts that reviewed the matter framed the dispute around liability for sexual abuse and defamation and whether official‑capacity immunity applied; multiple reports note the appeals court rejected the immunity defense and affirmed the monetary judgment on September 8, 2025 [4] [1]. The coverage identifies a legal outcome: liability and damages were sustained through appellate review, which is central to understanding the case’s finality in this record [1].
3. Stacey Williams: allegation reported, legal filing status unclear in these materials
The collection includes reporting that former model Stacey Williams publicly accused Trump of groping her in 1993, describing an episode she said occurred in Jeffrey Epstein’s presence; the coverage characterizes this as a reported allegation and frames it as the latest accusation at the time of reporting, but the materials do not document a settled civil judgment or the same kind of trial verdict present in Carroll’s case [2]. The sources indicate the Trump campaign denied Williams’s claim, and the reporting date listed for that piece is October 25, 2024, which situates the allegation in the 2024 news cycle rather than as a concluded lawsuit in these excerpts [2].
4. What the documents say about other alleged accusers and omissions in the record
These provided analyses repeatedly center Carroll and briefly mention Williams, while other well‑known accusers reported elsewhere are not detailed here; the materials therefore present a narrower list than the broader public record might include. The three sets of source fragments are consistent in highlighting Carroll’s verdict and appeals, and only one set includes Williams as a named accuser; the excerpts do not compile a comprehensive roster of all women who have ever accused Trump or filed civil suits, so readers should not infer completeness from these items alone [3] [6] [5].
5. How the sources handle potential agendas and differing emphases
The documents emphasize legal outcomes—verdicts and appeals—around Carroll’s case, which frames the narrative as a judicial vindication rather than merely allegation; this emphasis inherently centers official court determinations and monetary damages as the key facts [1] [4]. The coverage of Williams is framed as an allegation contested by Trump’s campaign, which the materials present with a denial; that contrast reveals different editorial choices about highlighting litigation versus reportage on public accusations [2]. Readers should note the distinct legal weight the sources assign to each named woman.
6. Timeline and sourcing: when these events and rulings are dated in the files
The appellate upholding of Carroll’s $83.3 million judgment is repeatedly dated as September 8, 2025 across the provided analyses, establishing that the appellate posture described is recent as of that date in the materials [1] [3] [4]. The Williams article cited is dated October 25, 2024, indicating her accusation entered public reporting in the 2024 cycle but is not shown here to have produced the same litigation outcome. These date stamps matter for assessing which matters reached judicial resolution versus staying in the public‑allegation phase [2] [1].
7. What remains unresolved in these excerpts and what a reader should check next
The provided material establishes Carroll’s successful civil judgment and appellate affirmance and reports Williams’s public accusation, but it does not present a comprehensive list of all women who have sued or accused Trump, nor does it indicate whether Williams filed a civil suit that led to a judgment. To complete the picture, a reader should consult additional contemporaneous court dockets and reporting beyond these excerpts to determine civil filing status for other accusers and any subsequent appeals or settlements; the documents here are authoritative for Carroll’s case but limited in scope for other allegations [1] [2] [3].