Where can the full New York Attorney General addendum listing Trump Organization properties be downloaded?

1. Where the file lives: the official AG download link and context

The authoritative copy of the addendum is hosted on the New York Attorney General’s site and accessible via the PDF titled “tto_release_properties_addendum-final.pdf,” which appears in the AG’s file directory ^[1]; the AG press release accompanying the lawsuit explicitly points readers to that addendum as part of the materials filed with the complaint ^[2]. The AG’s office has posted multiple case documents in the same online folder—complaints, exhibits and related filings—so the addendum sits alongside the formal complaint and exhibits that trace the office’s claims about property valuations and accounting practices ^{[3] [4]}.

2. Why that addendum matters and how it was presented by the AG

The addendum is not a standalone newsy summary but a document packaged by the AG as supporting material for a civil fraud case that alleges the Trump Organization misrepresented property values across many years; the press release that filed the lawsuit calls attention to the addendum as the detailed listing of properties and valuations the office relied on ^[2]. Reporting and court materials across outlets have used the AG’s filings—including the addendum and the main complaint—to identify specific properties the state says were valued inconsistently on financial statements submitted to banks and tax authorities ^{[3] [5]}.

3. Other official documents and corroborating filings to consult

The addendum should be read alongside the complaint and exhibits also posted by the AG—documents such as the main complaint PDF and the multi-part exhibits that list “Real and Operating Properties” and valuations—which are available in the AG’s online case folder ^{[3] [4]}. Court decisions and the state trial record further reference those filings and provide judicial findings and context; for example, the court’s published decision cites the AG filings and the trial record when addressing valuation practices and appraisals ^[6]. Journalistic summaries in outlets like Business Insider and local reporting also extract the six properties the AG highlighted in its initial public materials ^{[5] [7]}.

4. Alternative access routes and practical tips

For users who prefer navigating from the public announcement rather than guessing filenames, the AG’s press release for the lawsuit includes language and links directing readers to the “full addendum” and associated PDFs in the office’s press and litigation pages ^[2]. If the primary AG link is temporarily unavailable, the complaint and exhibits are duplicated in the AG’s case file ^{[3] [4]}, and major news organizations reporting on the case have mirrored or excerpted the material, though the official AG PDF is the authoritative source ^[5]. Court-hosted decisions and filings—such as the state Supreme Court decision—also provide citations back to the AG materials and can be used to cross-check references ^[6].

5. Limits of available reporting and why to verify dates and versions

Public reporting and the AG’s press materials make clear which documents were used in particular filings, but users should verify the file name and publication date on the AG site to ensure they are viewing the final addendum rather than an earlier draft or extract—AG releases and court exhibits can evolve during litigation ^{[2] [3]}. The reporting available to this analysis confirms the addendum’s location on the AG site and its role as supporting material for the fraud complaint, but does not provide alternate private repositories of the file beyond media excerpts and other public court documents ^{[1] [2]}.