Have any settlements been reached in lawsuits involving Dr Eric Berg and are terms public?

1. The California Proposition 65 settlement — public, specific monetary and injunctive terms

A Proposition 65 action against The Health & Wellness Center, Inc., dba Dr. Berg Nutritionals, is recorded in a California 60‑day notice and accompanied by a consent judgment/Judgment PDF that spells out injunctive obligations, monetary payments and allocations: the judgment enjoins certain product sales unless they meet specified lead‑exposure warning or content limits and sets out actual payment figures including a total recovery and an “Additional Settlement Payment” allocation to the Environmental Research Center for enforcement work ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Federal copyright/defamation/other civil suits — settlements noted but terms not publicly posted

Dockets in the U.S. District Court (Western District of Texas) show litigation by Dr. Eric Berg against Dr. Jacob Torres and include a Notice of Settlement and a court entry noting the case “Settled during ADR/Mediation,” but the docket entries and public case pages do not attach or publish a settlement agreement or show detailed terms on the public docket ^{[4] [5] [6]}. Thus while the court record confirms at least one mediated resolution, the settlement terms themselves are not available on the public docket entries reviewed.

3. Class action and consumer claims — active pleadings, no public settlement reported

A proposed class action filed in 2023 alleges Dr. Berg Nutritionals misrepresented “naturally flavored” labeling for its electrolyte powder; reporting outlines the claim and proposed class but does not report any settlement or judgment to date, indicating the matter remained a pending consumer suit at the time of that coverage ^[7]. No public settlement terms for that class action were found in the reviewed sources.

4. Professional disciplinary consent order — public administrative penalty and conditions

A state disciplinary consent order reported on Quackwatch details an agreed administrative reprimand and a monetary penalty of $1,500 against Eric Berg, D.C., together with conditions including continuing education and monitoring provisions; that consent order and its monetary penalty are publicly reported in the disciplinary summary ^[3]. This administrative document is a public remedy distinct from civil settlement but is a formal, recorded resolution of regulatory concerns.

5. What the public record shows — and what it does not

Public records examined show at least one detailed, publicly filed civil consent judgment in California (Prop 65) with monetary figures and injunctive language ^{[1] [2]}, and an administrative consent order with a specific fine and conditions ^[3]. Other federal dockets acknowledge settlements or mediations but either do not file the settlement agreement on the public docket or the docket entries supplied do not include the settlement terms ^{[4] [5]}. The reporting reviewed does not assert the absence of other settlements; it simply does not produce any additional settlement documents or public terms beyond those described.

6. Bottom line

Concrete, public settlement terms exist in the California Proposition 65 matter and in a state disciplinary consent order—both include specific financial and injunctive provisions and are publicly recorded ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Other federal cases involving Berg show settlement activity on dockets but lack attached public settlement agreements in the sources reviewed, leaving their terms undisclosed in the public filings available here ^{[4] [5]}.