How old was E. Jean Carroll when trump raped her

Checked on February 5, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

E. Jean Carroll says the assault by Donald Trump happened in the mid‑1990s — she has placed it in late 1995 or early 1996 — and public records show she was born in 1943, which makes her about 52 or 53 at the time of the alleged attack [1] rape-to-police-not-surprising-for-somebody-my-age" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[2]. Court findings and media coverage have treated the incident and the legal labels (rape, sexual abuse, forcible touching) separately: a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse in 1996, while later judicial commentary and appeals have parsed terminology and liability [3] [4] [5].

1. The basic arithmetic: birth year versus alleged date

E. Jean Carroll testified and media reporting state she was born in 1943 [2], and she has consistently placed the encounter at Bergdorf Goodman in the late 1995 to spring 1996 period [1] [6]. Subtracting those years shows she was about 52 if the episode occurred in late 1995 and about 53 if it occurred in early 1996 — figures that multiple commentators and scholars have cited when describing her age at the time [7] [8].

2. How reporting and the courts described the event and the label “rape”

Carroll publicly described the episode as an assault in a dressing room and later as rape in some public statements and courtroom testimony, while in other contexts she avoided the single word and framed it as a “fight” or an attack; news outlets have reflected both formulations [1] [9] [8]. Legally, a 2023 jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (a lesser statutory category) and awarded Carroll $5 million, declining to find him liable under the jury instructions for rape, while a later judicial opinion observed that Trump’s conduct could be described as rape “in common modern parlance” even if not within the narrow text of a specific New York Penal Law provision [3] [4] [5].

3. Why age mattered in the testimony and wider narrative

Carroll and commentators repeatedly emphasized her age at the time to underscore how the assault affected her life later: she has said the incident “destroyed her romantic life at the age of 53,” a detail reporters used to illustrate long‑term harm and to situate her within conversations about older survivors whose complaints were historically minimized [8] [7]. Academic and opinion pieces have noted that a survivor being in her early 50s when attacked complicates stereotypes about sexual violence and the demographics of victims, a point featured in legal and cultural analyses of the case [9] [7].

4. Points of dispute, legal nuance and the limits of available reporting

Contested terminology and legal thresholds matter: the jury’s finding of sexual abuse, the judge’s later language about the common‑sense meaning of rape, and the appeals record demonstrate that courts and journalists differentiate between criminal labels, civil liability and everyday descriptions — and those distinctions do not change the arithmetic of Carroll’s age in 1995–96 [3] [4] [10]. Reporting summarizes Carroll’s account and the judicial outcomes, but public sources do not supply an exact calendar date of the encounter, so age is stated as an approximate 52–53 based on year ranges Carroll herself provided and her 1943 birth year [1] [2].

5. Bottom line

Using Carroll’s own timeline (late 1995 or early 1996) and her recorded birth year , the factual answer is that she was about 52 or 53 years old when she says Donald Trump assaulted her; court proceedings later found Trump liable for sexual abuse in 1996 and legal commentary wrestled with whether the conduct should be called rape in different senses of the word [1] [2] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What did the 2023 jury specifically find in the E. Jean Carroll v. Trump case, and how did jurors differentiate sexual abuse from rape?
What is the Adult Survivors Act in New York and how did it enable E. Jean Carroll’s civil suit years after the alleged incident?
How have courts and judges interpreted the term 'rape' versus other sexual‑offense labels in civil cases involving historical allegations?