Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

How many online speech arrests were made in England in 2023 for comparison?

Checked on November 22, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available reporting from The Times and summaries by organisations and commentators put the number of arrests in England/Wales for online communications offences at about 12,183 in 2023 — roughly 30–33 per day — based on custody data from 37 police forces cited by the Free Speech Union and The Times [1] [2]. Parliamentary records and secondary summaries repeat the same 12,183 figure for arrests under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 [3] [2].

1. What the headline number represents — custody, not convictions

The frequently cited figure of 12,183 arrests in 2023 comes from custody data summarised by The Times and repeated by the Free Speech Union: it covers arrests logged by 37 police forces for communications offences in England and Wales, and is presented as arrests, not prosecutions or convictions [1] [2]. Parliamentary discussion likewise uses the 12,183 arrests wording for 2023 under section 127 and section 1 offences, making clear this is an arrest count rather than sentencing data [3].

2. Scope and legal context — which laws are involved

Reporting and later parliamentary and library analysis link the arrests to offences under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988, statutes that criminalise sending grossly offensive, indecent or threatening electronic messages and malicious communications [2] [3]. The House of Lords Library notes limitations in central government publishing: the Home Office reports arrests by offence group rather than specific offence types, so a neat official nationwide breakdown by exact statute is not centrally available [2].

3. How journalists and advocates framed the data — different emphases

The Times’ original custody-data reporting (summarised in the sources) and advocacy groups highlighted the scale to argue the police are “making more than 30 arrests a day” and to warn of a chilling effect on free speech [1] [4]. Civil-liberties voices emphasise rising arrest numbers and falling convictions — Ministry of Justice sentencing numbers for related offences (sentencings) were reported lower in 2023 than earlier years — to argue many arrests do not lead to court penalties [1] [5].

4. Nuance critics insist on — many arrests are for serious or non‑trivial conduct

Commentary and fact-checking pieces point out that “arrests for online speech” is a broad label: offences can include genuine threats, harassment, fake bomb threats, doxxing or other harmful communications as well as posts that are merely offensive; that helps explain why many arrests do not end in convictions [5]. Analysts note the Online Safety Act 2023 also changed the regulatory landscape from 2024, but the 2023 custody figures predate its full implementation [2] [5].

5. Limits in the publicly available record — data gaps and methodology

House of Lords Library commentary stresses that central government does not publish arrests by those specific communications offences and that the 12,183 figure reflects custody records from a subset (35–37) of police forces compiled by journalists rather than a single official national dataset [2]. That means the figure is significant and repeatedly cited, but readers should treat it as assembled from force-level custody returns rather than a neat Home Office release [2].

6. Competing perspectives and potential agendas

Advocates for free speech use the number to argue over‑policing of online expression and vague laws; campaigning groups like the Free Speech Union amplify the 12,183 figure and frame it as proof of a chilling effect [1] [4]. Other commentators and fact-checkers caution against interpreting all arrests as prosecutions for mere opinion, emphasising that many involve threats, harassment, or other conduct that may legitimately attract police attention [5]. Parliamentary summaries reproduce the figure when debating safeguards, indicating cross‑sector concern about the implications [6] [3].

7. Bottom line for comparison use

For comparative purposes, current reporting supports using “about 12,000 arrests in 2023 (12,183 reported)” as the commonly cited England/Wales figure, with the important caveat that this count comes from custody returns compiled by journalists/advocates across a subset of police forces, and represents arrests not convictions or specific legal outcomes [1] [2]. If you need a strict official breakdown by statute, outcome (charge/caution/conviction), or a fully national dataset, available sources do not mention a single centrally published Home Office table that provides that level of detail [2].

If you want, I can draft a short paragraph you can paste into a report that states the figure with the caveats above and cites the specific sources.

Want to dive deeper?
How many arrests for online speech were recorded across the UK in 2023, and how does England compare?
What UK laws most commonly lead to arrests for online speech in England in 2023?
Which police forces in England made the most online speech arrests in 2023 and why?
How do arrest figures for online speech in England in 2023 compare to previous years (trend analysis)?
What proportion of 2023 online-speech arrests in England resulted in prosecutions or charges versus warnings or no further action?