Exactly which autopsy photographs and diagrams were released or referenced in Epstein’s case, and what do they show?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The public releases tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s investigations have included thousands of photographs and documents — among them images of bodies and diagrams — but the sources reviewed do not show that formal autopsy photographs from the Office of Chief Medical Examiner were broadly published; investigators’ autopsy findings are referenced in government reports while separate estate- or FBI-taken images showing a body with writing and architectural diagrams were released by lawmakers and the Department of Justice (DOJ) in staggered tranches [1] [2] [3].
1. What the public releases actually contained
The initial DOJ disclosure and related congressional drops together produced thousands of images and documents that include FBI search photographs from Epstein properties, passport photos, party and travel photographs of Epstein with known public figures, notebooks and scrapped pages, and a subset of images described by House Democrats as showing a woman’s body with writing referencing Nabokov’s Lolita and assorted diagrams and passports — these items were part of an estate-originated cache and DOJ “DOJ Disclosures” of roughly 4,000 files in the early release [4] [2] [3].
2. What the official autopsy record shows — and what was released by investigators
The Justice Department Office of Inspector General’s review quotes and relies on the autopsy performed by the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner and cites autopsy results when describing the timeline and injuries observed after Epstein’s death, but the OIG report and mainstream coverage referenced an autopsy report rather than publishing raw autopsy photographs in the DOJ public trove; the OIG documentation confirms an autopsy was performed and its findings informed the oversight review but does not appear in the reviewed news reports as having been posted as images in the DOJ file release [1].
3. Images of a body with writing and what those photos show
Lawmakers and media reported that among the images released by Democrats were photographs that appear to depict a woman’s body with words written on it that reference Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita; outlets described the content as disturbing and tied it explicitly to materials that had been held in Epstein’s estate or seized during searches, but those images were presented by House Democrats as a selected sample rather than an unredacted wholesale dump and many faces and identifying details in released pictures have been redacted [2] [3].
4. Diagrams, plans and non-autopsy photographic evidence — what they depict
Beyond human images, the batches included diagrams and building plans, passports and travel records, FBI photos of interiors (including rooms with distinctive blue carpeting and erotic art), and selected screenshots of text messages and notebooks; BBC and other outlets highlighted that some released pictures were architectural or site diagrams and photos from searches of Epstein’s properties, which were provided to Congress and posted on the DOJ site as part of the transparency push [3] [5] [4].
5. Gaps, redactions, removals and competing narratives about what was — or wasn’t — released
Multiple outlets reported significant redactions and that the DOJ did not meet the full statutory deadline, that thousands of files remained withheld, and that some items briefly posted (including photos reportedly showing President Trump) were later removed from the public browser — all of which complicates any effort to catalogue a definitive list of “autopsy photographs and diagrams” released and leaves open the possibility that some forensic images exist in government files but have not been publicly posted or have been withheld for privacy or investigative reasons [6] [7] [8].
6. Bottom line: what can be stated with confidence and what remains uncertain
It is provable from the releases and committee disclosures that photographs of bodies with writing and various diagrams and property plans were among the images shown publicly by House Democrats and in the DOJ disclosure set, and that the OIG and medical examiner performed and cited an autopsy; however, the reviewed reporting does not document a public posting of the official medical examiner’s autopsy photographs themselves, and the record remains clouded by redactions, selective releases and removed files — therefore, whether formal autopsy images were released to the public in the DOJ/committee tranches cannot be confirmed from the provided sources [2] [3] [1] [6].