Which Epstein flight-log entries include Ghislaine Maxwell and what do those manifests indicate?

1. What these documents are and where they came from

The flight logs are handwritten pilot and manifest records covering trips on Epstein’s Boeing 727 and other aircraft from roughly 1991 through early 2003, compiled largely by pilot David Rodgers and entered into evidence in USA v. Maxwell as Government Exhibit 662‑RR; versions of the same 118‑page package were released by the Justice Department and made available via DocumentCloud and archives such as the Epstein Archive ^{[6] [7] [1]}.

2. How Maxwell appears in the manifests — frequency and form

Ghislaine Maxwell appears repeatedly in those pages, sometimes with a full name and often by initials such as “GM” or “G.M.”; reporting from the Maxwell trial describes numerous entries showing her presence on flights alongside Epstein and others across the 1990s ^{[2] [8]}. Prosecutors and pilot testimony used Rodgers’ personal log to place Maxwell on flights with witnesses and alleged victims in specific years — for example, entries and testimony linked her to flights in 1996, 1997, 1998 and into 2001 that overlapped with the travel histories of accusers referenced at trial ^[3].

3. What the manifests indicate about who else was on those flights

The manifests often list other passengers — including people later identified in press reporting and court filings as public figures — and several pages show Maxwell traveling with Epstein alongside other named or initialed passengers; this fuller passenger context is what led journalists to highlight flights that included high‑profile names such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew in press accounts of the released logs ^{[2] [8] [9]}. Reporting also notes entries that are less specific — for instance, some rows read “single female” or use initials rather than full names, meaning not every occupant is clearly identified ^[4].

4. How prosecutors and defense used the logs at trial — corroboration, not proof

At Maxwell’s trial prosecutors cited the flight logs to corroborate witness testimony about who traveled with Epstein and Maxwell, and Rodgers’ testimony linked specific log entries to known passengers and accusers, helping place individuals together on particular dates ^[3]. Legal and news coverage emphasize that while manifests can corroborate presence aboard aircraft, they do not by themselves prove criminal acts occurred on any given flight — they are one piece of documentary and testimonial evidence used in the broader prosecution ^{[2] [4]}.

5. Limits, redactions and competing interpretations

Observers and fact‑checkers note limits to what the logs can show: versions of the records have been released in differing levels of redaction across cases, some entries are ambiguous or abbreviated, and scholars of the files caution against drawing definitive conclusions about conduct solely from a name on a manifest ^{[5] [10]}. Defense arguments and skeptical reporting underline that travel records, without other corroborating evidence, are circumstantial — while prosecutors and some victims’ testimonies treat them as corroborative documentary proof of association and movement ^{[3] [2]}.

6. Bottom line: what the manifests signify in public record

Taken together, the released flight‑log pages plainly show that Ghislaine Maxwell was a frequent passenger on Epstein aircraft and that she was present on flights that included alleged victims and prominent figures; those facts strengthened prosecutorial narratives and witness claims at trial, but the logs themselves are fragmentary, sometimes ambiguous, and must be interpreted alongside testimony and other evidence rather than as dispositive proof of criminal acts on specific flights ^{[1] [3] [4]}.