Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What other prominent figures appear repeatedly in Epstein's flight logs and how does that compare to Trump?
Executive summary
Jeffrey Epstein’s publicly released flight logs and related document batches show many prominent figures named repeatedly — most notably Bill Clinton (dozens of flights in early 2000s), and frequent appearances by entertainers and business figures such as Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey and others — while Donald Trump appears multiple times in the 1990s (commonly reported as 4–8 flights depending on dataset) but far fewer than Clinton in the logged span cited by reporting (Clinton’s documented flights cluster in 2002–03) [1] [2] [3].
1. What the flight logs are — and what they do and don’t prove
The released materials are handwritten flight manifests, redacted contact books and related DOJ/committee document batches; they list passengers, dates and routes but do not by themselves establish criminal conduct — the Department of Justice and law-enforcement reviews have said flight manifests are association evidence, not proof of wrongdoing (available sources do not mention a blanket legal conclusion that names on logs equal guilt) [4] [5] [6].
2. Who shows up repeatedly: Bill Clinton and the post-presidency pattern
Reporting highlights Bill Clinton as a repeatedly listed passenger on Epstein aircraft, particularly during the 2002–03 period after he left the White House; outlets note Clinton took numerous flights with Epstein in that timeframe, making him one of the most frequent names in the flight manifests cited in coverage [1] [3].
3. Other recurring names from entertainment, business and royalty
Beyond presidents, the logs and related releases include many entertainment and business figures who appear across reporting: Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Prince Andrew and various corporate and academic figures have been listed in flight manifests or Epstein’s contact book, and multiple news outlets ran broad name lists when DOJ/committee pages were published [1] [7] [8].
4. Where Trump fits: frequency, timing and context
News outlets cite Donald Trump appearing multiple times on Epstein’s plane in the 1990s — commonly four flights in 1993 plus at least one each in 1994, 1995 and 1997, and some analyses count up to seven or eight logged trips depending on which documents are tallied — and some entries include family members on board [2] [9] [10] [3]. Coverage emphasizes these were largely domestic flights in the 1990s and that Trump denies wrongdoing; reporting also stresses that presence on a manifest does not by itself indicate participation in crimes [2] [10] [11].
5. Comparing Trump to Clinton and others: frequency versus concentration
The comparison most reporters draw is one of pattern and timing: Trump’s logged trips center in the 1990s and number in the single digits by most accounts, while Clinton’s documented flights cluster after his presidency and amount to a substantially larger number in some documents [2] [1] [3]. Many other famous names appear intermittently rather than repeatedly over a concentrated period; the headlines therefore often contrast Clinton’s heavy early-2000s presence with Trump’s sparser 1990s entries [1] [7].
6. Interpretive disputes and partisan framing
Political actors have used the same documents to push competing narratives: some Republicans and supporters of Trump have highlighted that many names appear without evidence of criminality and have accused Democrats of selective leaks; Democrats and critics have pointed to emails and other documents released later that they say raise additional questions about relationships [12] [13] [14]. News organizations and fact-checkers caution that the documents can be cherry-picked to imply more than they prove and that associations do not equal guilt [5] [15].
7. Limitations in the public record and remaining unknowns
Available sources repeatedly note substantial caveats: flight logs use initials and shorthand, pilots sometimes logged passengers ambiguously, and released batches have been partial and redacted — meaning presence on a list is ambiguous and contextual details (purpose of travel, co-passengers, timing relative to alleged crimes) are often missing from public files [6] [4] [7]. Available sources do not mention any definitive, public legal finding that any named third party was complicit based solely on flight logs [5].
8. Takeaway for readers
Flight logs reliably document contact and travel but are evidence of association, not proof of criminality; in the released material Bill Clinton emerges as a frequent passenger in a concentrated post-presidential period, while Donald Trump appears multiple times in the 1990s but far less frequently in the logged windows cited by reporting — interpreting what that means requires caution, full context and corroborating evidence beyond a name on a manifest [1] [2] [10].