Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Have families of Epstein victims or journalists filed FOIA suits to force release of Epstein files during or after Biden's term?
Executive summary
Multiple FOIA-driven legal efforts and public-pressure campaigns sought Justice Department and FBI records tied to Jeffrey Epstein both during and after President Joe Biden’s term; the nonprofit Democracy Forward filed a high-profile FOIA suit in July–August 2025 seeking communications about the so‑called “Epstein Files,” and victims and journalists have separately pursued FOIA or court avenues over several years [1] [2] [3]. Congressional and survivor-led pushes accelerated releases in 2025, culminating in a near‑unanimous congressional vote to force broader disclosure that differs from individual FOIA litigation [4] [5] [6].
1. Early FOIA fights and reporter lawsuits — a long running effort
Journalists and outside groups have used FOIA repeatedly to pry open Epstein-era records: media entities began litigating as early as 2017 (Radar Online’s suit is referenced in later reporting), and outlets and watchdogs continued appeals when the FBI withheld materials; Business Insider and Judicial Watch are named in follow-ups over denials and appeals [7]. The public record shows FOIA litigation predates the Biden presidency and continued through it, indicating a multi‑year strategy by journalists and watchdogs to force disclosure [7].
2. Democracy Forward’s “first‑of‑its‑kind” suit in 2025
Democracy Forward filed FOIA requests with DOJ and FBI on July 25, 2025 and then sued to compel records about senior administration communications and any correspondence between Epstein and President Trump; the group described the lawsuit as the first specifically targeting the Trump‑Vance administration’s handling of the Epstein Files and framed the litigation as seeking transparency about how those materials were treated [1] [2] [3]. Democracy Forward’s public materials emphasize urgent public interest in flight logs, contacts and agency communications [1] [2].
3. Victims’ legal pressure and public appeals
Survivors pressed courts and public officials for release of investigative materials across administrations. Reporting shows victims wrote to judges and publicly campaigned for releases; a coalition of survivors ran ads and held news conferences demanding disclosure, arguing DOJ withheld records while investigations or appeals remained open [8] [9] [10]. This survivor pressure ran parallel to FOIA suits and congressional action, and sometimes cited concerns DOJ redactions would obscure accountability while protecting privacy [8] [9].
4. DOJ resistances and the “ongoing investigation” rationale
The DOJ under the Biden administration — and later under the Trump administration — cited FOIA Exemption 7(A) and the risk to ongoing investigations or prosecutions when resisting broader releases; Newsweek and other outlets reported the Biden DOJ withheld materials on that basis in 2022 and later used similar rationales [11] [10]. Business Insider and other reporting note the DOJ asked a judge to dismiss some suits on procedural grounds, and agencies often redacted victim identities while preserving investigatory secrecy [7] [12].
5. Congress’ 2025 intervention changed the dynamic
Independent of individual FOIA suits, Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025 by overwhelming margins in the House and swift Senate action, obliging DOJ to publish many unclassified records unless narrowly exempted — a statutory route that effectively compelled broader disclosure beyond what FOIA litigation alone had achieved [4] [5] [13]. Survivors and advocates hailed this as a corrective after years of piecemeal releases; opponents warned about privacy and harm to potential investigations [14] [4].
6. Who sued whom, and when — what the sources confirm
Available reporting explicitly documents Democracy Forward’s FOIA requests and ensuing lawsuit in late July/early August 2025 challenging DOJ and FBI handling of Epstein records [1] [2] [3]. Sources also note earlier FOIA litigation by media outlets (e.g., Radar Online’s 2017 suit referenced in contemporaneous coverage) and ongoing appeals by outlets such as Business Insider and watchdog groups during the Biden term [7]. Sources do not provide a comprehensive list of every individual victim’s FOIA suit during Biden’s presidency; available sources do not mention a consolidated roster of all victim-initiated FOIA lawsuits during that period [7].
7. Competing framings and hidden agendas to note
Democracy Forward framed its suit as guarding transparency and accountability; congressional Republicans and some survivors pushed statute-based mandatory disclosure after alleging DOJ secrecy masked malfeasance [2] [4]. At the same time, critics warned that politically timed disclosures could be weaponized in election cycles and that disclosures risk exposing victim identities — a tension that both DOJ and some members of Congress cited [11] [14]. News outlets show that partisan actors on both sides have used the files for political advantage, so motivations behind pushes for release are mixed [15] [4].
8. Bottom line for your question
Yes: journalists and legal organizations pursued FOIA suits both before and after Biden’s term, and Democracy Forward filed a notable FOIA lawsuit in July–August 2025 specifically challenging the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein records; victims and advocates also used FOIA requests, admons and litigation tactics alongside congressional pressure to force release, culminating in statutory action in November 2025 [1] [2] [3] [4]. Sources do not supply a complete catalogue of every FOIA filing by individual victims during Biden’s term; available sources do not mention a single centralized list of such suits [7].