Have any known Epstein survivors made allegations about other young girls being tortured or murdered?

1. Survivors have described torture and sadistic abuse

Multiple survivors have described non-consensual violence and what they characterize as torture: survivor interviews and memoirs include accounts of being choked, physically hurt, and otherwise abused in ways they describe as sadistic, with Rina Oh alleging a “closet of torture” used by Ghislaine Maxwell to hurt girls and Virginia Giuffre recounting being abused, choked and raped and referring to encounters that she framed as torturous in her memoir ^{[1] [4]}.

2. Allegations that Epstein trafficked girls to others who harmed them

Attorneys who represent victims and survivors say victim testimony indicates Epstein “provided girls to other famous and notable people,” and newly released Department of Justice files contain allegations that Epstein trafficked girls to third parties, which survivors and advocates emphasize as evidence that abuse extended beyond Epstein and Maxwell ^{[2] [5]}.

3. Murder and killing claims appear in documents but are unverified or disputed

Among the trove of documents released in 2026 were sensational and unverified tips — including an FBI tip alleging that a public figure had witnessed the killing and disposal of an infant born to a trafficking victim — but those items are described in publicly available summaries as unverified leads rather than proven facts, and journalists and legal observers warn the files contain raw allegations that require corroboration ^{[3] [2]}.

4. Survivors and their lawyers press for fuller accountability while warning about sloppy releases

Survivors’ groups and attorneys have publicly denounced the Justice Department’s handling of the files, arguing the releases expose victims while obscuring perpetrators and that the documents contain redaction errors and unvetted allegations; they contend that the material shows a broader network and serious allegations that warrant further investigation, even as courts and reporters caution about drawing definitive conclusions from unvetted records ^{[6] [5] [7]}.

5. Some media and political outlets amplify extreme claims—assess source agendas

A range of outlets have amplified dramatic allegations — from mainstream reporting parsing the files to partisan and fringe publications asserting names and crimes — so assessing credibility matters: reputable outlets report survivors’ testimony and unverified document entries and stress the need for corroboration ^{[2] [3]}, while less reliable pieces sometimes assert guilt for named public figures without the evidentiary backing that prosecutors or independent investigators have established ^[8].

6. What the public record can and cannot confirm right now

The record confirms that survivors have alleged torture and extreme physical abuse by Epstein’s circle and that some survivors have said Epstein provided girls to other men; the record also contains document entries and unverified tips alleging killings connected to trafficking, but there is no broad, court-established public finding — based on the sources reviewed — that named survivors have definitively proven or obtained judicial findings that other young girls were murdered as part of Epstein’s operation ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

7. Final assessment: allegations exist, proof is limited and contested

In short, survivors have made credible, consistent allegations about torture and sadistic abuse, and the released files include allegations that trafficked girls were delivered to others and even allegations of killings; however, those murder-related claims remain largely unverified in the public record, are contested, and require independent corroboration and investigative follow-up rather than being treated as established fact ^{[1] [2] [3]}.