Which Epstein victims have publicly accused Trump and what did their affidavits or depositions allege?

1. Known public accusers and the documentary record

The reporting and document releases in late 2025 and the lawsuits filed earlier list multiple survivors who have gone public about Epstein’s trafficking; among those, Virginia Giuffre was repeatedly identified in congressional releases as an Epstein accuser (and was referenced in emails about Trump) and other survivors such as Danielle Bensky have publicly condemned President Trump’s comments about the files ^{[4] [5]}. A separate federal complaint and attached affidavits — widely circulated in media caches — alleges that a “Jane Doe” said Trump attended parties where underage girls were present and that she was known to be 13; the complaint text available in these sources describes physical assault and threats as part of that allegation ^{[1] [6]}.

2. What affidavits and depositions allege, as reported

The court complaint excerpts and affidavit material available in the provided files include detailed allegations: the plaintiff says Epstein had sexual contact with her at parties, that Trump and Epstein attended some of those gatherings, and that the plaintiff believed both men knew of her age; the filings also describe threats and violence aimed to silence victims ^{[1] [6]}. Congressional Democrats released emails from Epstein’s estate in which Epstein wrote that Trump “spent hours at my house” with one alleged victim and that Trump “knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop,” statements Democrats characterized as incriminating and which the White House disputed as selective leaks ^{[2] [3]}.

3. Dispute over context and credibility

There is clear disagreement among actors about what the documents prove. Oversight Democrats framed Epstein’s emails and victim statements as evidence that Trump had knowledge of abuse; the White House and Trump allies insist the Democrats selectively released items to smear the president and that Epstein’s bragging is unreliable ^{[2] [7]}. Media outlets note Epstein’s own contradictory chatter — he insulted Trump in some messages while also suggesting Trump had been around victims — which shows the documents are not straightforward proof of criminal conduct by Trump but do raise questions lawmakers want answered ^{[8] [3]}.

4. Legal status and limits of the public record

Available reporting and the released documents show lawsuits and complaints exist that name Trump in civil claims; however, the sources also emphasize that “no criminal wrongdoing has ever been established against Trump in connection with Epstein’s crimes” as reflected in broader reporting and summary treatments ^[9]. The newly released materials are being parsed by Congress and the press; Democrats pressed for public transparency while Republicans and the White House have called the effort politicized ^{[10] [11]}.

5. Why survivors’ public statements matter politically and legally

Survivors such as Danielle Bensky have become vocal advocates for releasing the full files and have publicly challenged Trump’s description of the probe as a “hoax,” arguing the rhetoric undermines victims’ credibility and the push for transparency ^{[5] [12]}. Those public accounts, whether given in affidavits, depositions or media interviews, shape congressional pressure to publish documents and can influence public understanding even when the legal standard for criminal proof is not met in the documents released so far ^{[10] [13]}.

6. What the current sources do not establish

Available sources do not mention any final court finding that Trump committed criminal acts related to Epstein’s trafficking, nor do they show a completed criminal prosecution of Trump on these matters ^[9]. They also do not contain the full set of sealed affidavits, depositions or transcripts that might exist in case files beyond the document troves released by the House or leaked into public caches; the oversight releases are still being reviewed ^{[2] [3]}.

7. Bottom line for readers

Survivors and civil plaintiffs have publicly accused Trump in filings and in media statements; key evidentiary pieces cited by Democrats include Epstein’s own emails asserting Trump’s proximity to victims, while Trump’s team calls those excerpts selective and misleading ^{[2] [7]}. The documents raise questions that Congress and journalists are investigating, but the public record in these sources does not yet show an adjudicated criminal finding against Trump in connection with Epstein’s crimes ^[9].