Fact check: Have prosecutors or family released statements about Erica Kirk's case in 2024 or 2025?

1. What the family publicly said — a widow’s first words and public stance

Erika Kirk made multiple public statements in September 2025 that were widely reported; she thanked supporters, described telling their young child about the death, called Charlie a good man and the “perfect husband and father,” and announced she would continue his work and express forgiveness toward the accused in at least one report. These family statements are documented across several outlets and are dated September 12–23, 2025, indicating concentrated family communications in the immediate aftermath of the killing rather than earlier. The reporting emphasizes Erika’s public role as grieving widow and public figure, and notes her expressions of forgiveness and resolve ^{[1] [4] [5] [6]}.

2. What prosecutors publicly released — evidence and legal moves in September 2025

Prosecutors issued public statements and filings in mid-September 2025 that disclosed investigatory materials and described legal steps. Those releases included text messages attributed to the suspect and the formal charging of the accused with multiple counts, including aggravated murder, with prosecutors indicating the death penalty was an available option. A pretrial protective order barring the defendant from contacting Erika Kirk was entered and reported as well. These are official prosecutorial actions and disclosures tied to charging decisions and victim protection, and they are dated to September 16–23, 2025 in the supplied accounts ^{[2] [3] [6]}.

3. Timeline clarity: why no 2024 statements appear in the record

All supplied analyses and reports about statements from either the family or prosecutors are dated September 2025; none of the provided items indicate statements in 2024. The collected pieces repeatedly place the first public remarks from Erika and the prosecutorial announcements in mid-September 2025, coinciding with arrest, charging, and early court filings. The absence of 2024-dated materials in the dataset suggests the public record, as provided, begins with events around the arrest and charging in 2025, rather than showing any earlier public statements by prosecutors or family members in 2024 ^{[1] [4] [2]}.

4. How outlets framed those statements — differing emphases and potential agendas

Coverage differs by outlet emphasis: human-interest outlets foregrounded Erika’s grief and forgiveness, focusing on family sentiment and personal detail; legal and national outlets emphasized prosecutorial details such as texts, charges, and potential capital exposure. The divergence signals different news priorities: some coverage centers empathy and personal narrative while other reporting highlights legal process and public-safety implications. The supplied sources include mainstream national outlets and entertainment/people-style reporting, which may explain variance in tone and which quotes or filings were highlighted ^{[1] [4] [2] [6]}.

5. What remains unaddressed in the supplied record and why it matters

The provided materials do not include 2024 statements or earlier family comments, nor do they provide full prosecution filings beyond summaries of texts and the protective order. Key omissions include the suspect’s formal arraignment transcript, detailed charging documents, and any investigative timeline prior to the September 2025 arrest. Those gaps limit definitive conclusions about whether quieter or private communications occurred earlier; however, based on the supplied record, publicly available statements from both prosecutors and the family are concentrated in September 2025 and not in 2024 ^{[3] [7] [4]}.

6. Bottom line for the original question — concise factual answer

Based on the assembled analyses, prosecutors and the family did release public statements in 2025—principally in mid-to-late September 2025—while there is no evidence in these sources of statements from either prosecutors or family during 2024. The family’s public statements came from Erika Kirk and focused on grief and resolve; prosecutors’ communications included evidentiary disclosures and court protections tied to criminal charges and the potential death-penalty exposure ^{[1] [2] [3]}.