What evidence has been presented in court regarding Donald Trump and allegations of sexual misconduct with minors?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Multiple civil cases and recent filings have produced sworn declarations and courtroom evidence alleging Donald Trump took part in sexual misconduct, including a refiled 2025 federal complaint claiming a rape of a 13‑year‑old at a party involving Jeffrey Epstein and Trump; that complaint contains a signed declaration from the plaintiff describing a "savage sexual attack" [1]. Separately, a 2023 jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding $5 million—a verdict later upheld on appeal in December 2024 and again in mid‑2025—which relied in part on testimony from other women and a 2005 recording [2] [3].
1. Civil jury finding in the Carroll case and what evidence was admitted
A New York trial jury in 2023 concluded Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll and defamed her, awarding $5 million; the appeals court later affirmed that verdict [2] [3]. Federal courts upheld district court rulings that allowed testimony from two other women who alleged prior sexual assaults by Trump and a 2005 recording in which Trump described grabbing and kissing women without consent; the appeals court found those items admissible under rules permitting evidence of other sexual assaults in sexual‑assault civil cases [2].
2. What the Carroll evidence consisted of and how it was used
Court records and reporting note the trial featured Carroll's account of an assault in a department‑store dressing room and corroborating material allowed under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 415—namely, other victims’ testimony and the 2005 recording—introduced to show a pattern of sexual misconduct relevant to her claim [2]. Trump’s legal team challenged those evidentiary rulings on appeal, but the Second Circuit found no error [2] [3].
3. Refiled federal complaint alleging rape of a minor and its declarations
In 2025 a Jane Doe refiled a federal suit that charges Trump raped her at a private sex party when she was 13, and the new filing reiterates a previously withdrawn complaint; the original filing included two declarations, one signed by the plaintiff describing what she called a "savage sexual attack" and alleging Jeffrey Epstein also raped the plaintiff and quarreled with Trump over who would take the minor’s virginity [1]. That complaint is a civil filing and, as reported, rests on the plaintiff’s sworn declarations contained in the court papers [1].
4. Settlements and social‑media claims about child‑sex settlements — what reporting finds
A circulated list claiming Trump paid multiple settlements for child‑sex crimes involving 10‑ to 13‑year‑olds was investigated by fact‑checkers, which found no evidence supporting those specific settlement claims; PolitiFact reported it could not verify the list of six settlements and noted sourcing traced to an unverified blog and the Wayne Madsen Report [4]. Available sources do not mention verified court judgments or public settlement records matching that circulated list [4].
5. Competing narratives and legal posture
Trump has repeatedly denied allegations; in the Carroll litigation he sought reversal and raised defenses including evidentiary challenges and arguments about immunity that were rejected on appeal [3] [2]. Plaintiffs’ accounts and sworn declarations form the factual core of the civil complaints and were accepted by jurors or admitted by courts in multiple instances [2] [1]. Available sources do not mention criminal convictions related to these allegations in the referenced materials (not found in current reporting).
6. Limits of the public record and what remains unresolved
The refiled Jane Doe suit is a civil complaint backed by declarations and has not, in the cited reporting, resulted in a criminal conviction; the Carroll verdict is a civil finding of sexual abuse and defamation upheld on appeal [1] [2]. Reporting indicates courts admitted corroborative testimony and the 2005 recording as probative under federal evidentiary rules, but sources do not provide the full trial transcripts or all underlying proofs, and they do not cover any subsequent criminal investigations tied to the same allegations in these documents [2] [1].
7. What to watch next and why context matters
Key developments to monitor are whether the Jane Doe civil suit advances through discovery or motion practice and whether any criminal authorities open parallel inquiries; appellate and Supreme Court filings in the Carroll matter could further define how evidentiary rules apply to allegations of sexual misconduct by public figures [1] [3]. Reporters and readers should distinguish between sworn civil complaints and adjudicated civil verdicts—the Carroll judgment was adjudicated and affirmed on appeal, while the Jane Doe rape allegation currently exists as a refiled complaint supported by declarations [2] [1].