Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What evidence supports claims that Kirk made racist statements about Black people in 2023?
Executive summary
Reporting compiled after Charlie Kirk’s 2025 death includes multiple contemporaneous clips and excerpts showing he made derogatory remarks about Black people in 2023 — notably a May 19, 2023 podcast line saying “prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people” and several comments questioning whether Black professionals benefited from affirmative action [1] [2] [3]. Major news outlets and local clergy quoted or summarized those 2023 remarks when assessing his record [4] [5].
1. What the contemporaneous record shows: direct quotes and dates
Audio and podcast excerpts from 2023 and coverage that cites them are the core evidence: reporters and outlets attribute to Kirk a May 19, 2023 statement on his show that “prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people,” plus 2023 remarks questioning whether Black professionals were hired on merit or because of affirmative action [1] [2] [3]. Reuters summarized that Kirk “blam[ed] Black people for crime” and dismissed affirmative action and diversity programs, citing his 2023 rhetoric [4].
2. How multiple outlets corroborated the same lines
Independent outlets that later compiled his public statements — including the BBC, The Irish Times and local U.S. coverage — quote the same 2023 lines or paraphrase them, indicating those phrases were widely circulated and attributed to Kirk in recorded appearances or podcasts [2] [3] [1]. Local reporting and commentary by Black pastors also referenced the same 2023 podcast quote as evidence of his rhetoric [5] [4].
3. Patterns beyond single sentences: themes and context
Sources present a pattern across 2023 and surrounding years: repeated attacks on affirmative action and comments questioning the competence of Black professionals, coupled with framing Black people as criminals in discussions of “urban America.” Multiple outlets cite these as a coherent theme of his public commentary rather than isolated misstatements [3] [4] [6].
4. Defenders and disputes over context
Not all outlets accept the “racist” label without caveat. Opinion and partisan outlets have pushed counterarguments: some commentators argue the quotes are taken out of context or represent “uncomfortable truths” rather than racism, and at least one comedian and other defenders disputed the characterization after his death [7] [8]. FactCheck.org noted some contested attributions and said it “did not immediately find” some specific phrases but did confirm he made related remarks at identifiable events [9].
5. Institutional and community reactions as corroboration
Beyond media compilations, institutional reactions (e.g., Congressional and clergy statements) and reporting on public memorials and protests referenced the 2023 remarks when describing why many Black leaders and others denounced Kirk’s rhetoric — showing the 2023 comments informed official and community assessments [10] [5] [11].
6. What the available sources do not show or verify
Available sources do not provide a single, unbroken audio transcript in this packet for every quoted line; instead they rely on recordings obtained or reported by journalists and on excerpts preserved in later compilations [9] [12]. Some viral attributions circulating after his death were flagged as not precisely worded or not immediately verified [9]. If you want primary audio for every line, the sources here point to podcasts and event recordings but the raw files are not attached in this set [9] [12].
7. Why this matters: rhetoric, public impact, and agendas
News organizations and clergy framed the 2023 comments as part of a broader pattern that either reflected genuine belief or a deliberate rhetorical strategy to provoke and energize a base; outlets critical of Kirk treat the quotes as evidence of racial animus, while defenders portray them as blunt political argumentation or out-of-context attacks on policies [4] [7]. Note the implicit agendas: advocacy outlets and critics emphasize harm and white-supremacist resonances, while sympathetic commentators stress free-speech or political motives [6] [7].
8. Bottom line and next steps for verification
Published reporting and multiple independent outlets attribute explicit anti-Black comments to Kirk in 2023, most prominently the May 19 podcast remark and repeated affirmative-action jibes [1] [2] [3]. For readers seeking airtight verification, review original audio/video of The Charlie Kirk Show or the specific 2023 event recordings cited by Wired and later cited by Snopes and others; the present collection documents consistent attribution but does not include every primary audio file [9] [12].