Which FBI 302s identify Jean‑Luc Brunel as an intermediary and what testimony do they contain?

1. What the public releases actually show about Brunel’s role

Multiple documents released in the broader “Epstein files” disclosures and cited in news reporting place Brunel among a short list of Epstein associates and alleged co‑conspirators, and describe him in terms consistent with an intermediary/ procurer who supplied girls to Epstein and his circle; those characterizations appear in an internal FBI organizational chart and in FBI presentations or slides disclosed to oversight bodies and the press ^{[1] [2]}.

2. Where reporting points to FBI sources rather than named 302s

The press accounts identify an August 2019 internal FBI document listing suspected co‑conspirators that shows Brunel’s name or image alongside others, and they reference FBI slides and memos that summarize investigative leads—including allegations about travel and “girls” tied to a person reporters say appears to be Brunel—but the reports do not quote or publish individual 302 forms or give 302 identification numbers ^{[1] [2]}.

3. What alleged testimony or allegations are reported (and their provenance)

News reporting and court exhibits summarize allegations attributed to witnesses and victims that Brunel recruited or trafficked underage girls for Epstein, and they cite victim complaints, police probes and investigative summaries rather than verbatim 302 transcripts; examples include a 1996 complaint noted in released materials, contemporary victim statements to media, and references in an FBI presentation to email chains and allegations of girls being routed for travel—materials that the Guardian and ABC reporting say implicate Brunel as an associate who arranged or procured victims ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

4. Gaps: no public source in the provided reporting prints the 302s or their direct testimony

Despite repeated references to FBI memoranda and presentations, the supplied sources do not reproduce the text of any specific FBI 302 (the agent‑summary form), do not provide 302 form identifiers, and do not attach full witness‑summary content; therefore it is not possible from these sources to quote what a named 302 “contains” line‑by‑line, or to catalog exact witness statements recorded on such forms ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

5. Corroboration, denials and prosecutorial posture

Independent reporting and public court exhibits also show Brunel was long accused by models and in media exposés of sexual misconduct and procuring, that French authorities later charged him, and that he denied allegations; an internal U.S. memo reported by ABC said Brunel indicated he would invoke the Fifth if subpoenaed, a fact prosecutors considered while weighing co‑conspirator charges after Epstein’s death—this establishes both prosecutorial interest and Brunel’s refusal to provide testimony in the U.S. process cited in the reporting ^{[4] [3] [5]}.

6. How investigators and reporters have used the FBI summaries

Investigators appear to have used 302s and other internal summaries to build charts and slide decks that map associations and allegations; those derivative exhibits are what journalists and oversight bodies have released or described publicly (for example, the chart showing suspected co‑conspirators and the slide decks discussed in reporting), but the underlying 302s remain redacted or unposted in the materials provided to the press in these sources ^{[1] [2]}.

7. Bottom line and where a reader goes next

The materials made public and cited here identify Jean‑Luc Brunel as an Epstein associate described by FBI exhibits and internal presentations as a procurer/intermediary and summarize allegations from victims and complaints, but the supplied reporting does not provide or identify the specific FBI 302 report numbers or the verbatim testimony contained within any 302s—obtaining that would require access to the unredacted DOJ/FBI release packages or court filings that specifically enumerate and attach individual 302s, which are not present in the cited sources ^{[1] [2] [3]}.