Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What was the total number of reported hate crimes against trans people in 2024 according to the FBI?

Checked on October 21, 2025

Executive Summary

The available reporting drawn from the provided analyses gives two competing tallies for 2024: one source reports 527 hate crime offenses targeting gender identity (including 382 anti‑trans offenses and 145 anti‑gender‑nonconforming offenses), while an advocacy summary counts 463 single‑bias incidents targeting gender identity. These differences reflect measurement choices — “offenses” vs “incidents” vs “victims” — and reporting limits in the FBI data; the FBI’s public materials emphasized percentages (about 3.9–4% for gender-identity bias) without a uniform single-line “trans total” across every release [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Why the headline numbers diverge — offenses, incidents, or victims?

The datasets cited use different units: one analysis reports 527 hate crime offenses motivated by gender identity in 2024, broken into 382 anti‑trans and 145 anti‑gender‑nonconforming offenses, while another reports 463 single‑bias incidents targeting gender identity. This matters because a single incident can include multiple offenses, and reporting can count victims separately from offenses or incidents, producing different totals from the same underlying events. The FBI’s published summary emphasized percentages (3.9–4%) of single‑bias incidents for gender identity rather than a single “trans-only” nationwide count, contributing to public confusion [1] [2] [3] [4].

2. What the 527/382 breakdown claims and where it comes from

The 527-offense figure appears in a news summary of the FBI data that explicitly separates gender-identity-motivated offenses into 382 anti‑trans and 145 anti‑gender‑nonconforming categories, yielding a total of 527 gender‑identity offenses in 2024. That source is dated August 8, 2025 and frames the numbers as FBI data distilled into offense counts rather than incidents or victims. The 382 anti‑trans count is the most direct numeric claim about offenses motivated by anti‑trans bias in the provided analyses, but it is framed as part of an offense-level tally rather than an incident- or victim-level total [1].

3. The alternate 463 single‑bias incidents figure and its provenance

GLAAD’s response summarized the FBI’s reporting by stating there were 463 single‑bias incidents targeting gender identity in 2024. Single‑bias incident counts are the FBI’s standard unit in many releases and capture each distinct incident where a single motivating bias is identified. The GLAAD framing emphasizes incidents for advocacy and trend analysis, and its August 6, 2025 summary used that incident tally to highlight impacts on transgender communities. The difference between 463 incidents and 527 offenses likely reflects multiple offenses being recorded within some incidents [2].

4. FBI reporting practices and the role of percentages

Multiple analyses note the FBI framed gender‑identity bias as roughly 3.9–4% of single‑bias incidents in 2024 but did not always provide a straightforward, single-line “number of anti‑trans hate crimes” across all of its public statements. The FBI’s public tables and summaries often report victim counts, incidents, and offense types separately, requiring secondary interpretation to derive a single trans‑targeted total. Several analyses flagged that the public-facing FBI narrative emphasized proportional context rather than a single cumulative trans-only tally, which fosters divergent media and advocacy interpretations [3] [4] [5].

5. Reporting limitations and undercounting risks that matter to interpretation

Observers consistently warn that FBI figures undercount the true incidence of bias violence due to uneven local reporting, law enforcement classification practices, and the system’s shift to NIBRS-only reporting in recent years. The 2021 supplemental discussions referenced the transition to NIBRS and the importance of consistent reporting standards; advocacy groups also stressed incomplete jurisdictional participation and victims’ reluctance to report, implying that both the 382 anti‑trans offenses and the 463 incidents are likely conservative underestimates of actual anti‑trans violence [6] [7] [8].

6. Advocacy groups’ emphases and complementary data points

Advocacy organizations used the FBI data differently: some extracted offense-level counts to highlight precise anti‑trans offense numbers, while others emphasized incident counts and deaths to underscore severity. The Human Rights Campaign documented at least 32 fatal anti‑transgender and gender‑expansive deaths in 2024 — a complementary but distinct measure from FBI nonfatal offense or incident counts — illustrating how fatality tracking and FBI statistics answer different questions about scope and lethality [8] [1].

7. Bottom line and what a careful answer should say right now

Given the provided analyses, the clearest, sourced numeric statements are: 527 gender‑identity-motivated hate crime offenses in 2024 (382 anti‑trans, 145 anti‑gender‑nonconforming) reported in one FBI-derived summary, and 463 single‑bias incidents targeting gender identity reported in a separate advocacy summary. Both figures are drawn from the FBI’s 2024 dataset but represent different measurement choices; neither should be treated as the definitive “one true” count without noting these methodological distinctions and the likelihood of undercounting [1] [2] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
How does the FBI define and track hate crimes against trans individuals?
What was the total number of reported hate crimes against trans people in 2023 compared to 2024?
Which states had the highest rates of reported hate crimes against trans people in 2024?
What support services are available for trans victims of hate crimes in the US?
How does the FBI's hate crime reporting data compare to other sources, such as the National Center for Transgender Equality?