Are there FBI interview transcripts or notes of Donald Trump about Jeffrey Epstein (date and source)?

1. What supporters of the claim point to and why it caught on

Advocates of the claim that the FBI possesses interview records of Trump about Epstein rely on the frequent association of Trump’s name with Epstein in released emails and files and on reports that FBI personnel were ordered to flag materials mentioning Trump during a document review; those two facts create the impression that an interview must exist ^{[4] [3]}. The reporting that Epstein’s communications and third‑party correspondence reference Trump, combined with the extraordinary public interest in Epstein’s network, naturally fuels assumptions that law enforcement queried high‑profile figures and produced interview transcripts; that intuitive leap goes beyond what the documentation shows, because flagging for mentions is a procedural step and is not the same as a recorded interview ^{[6] [3]}.

2. What the reviewed government materials and major reporting actually show

Careful review of the relevant public materials and journalistic reporting finds no released FBI interview transcript or FBI note explicitly documenting an interrogation or sworn interview of Donald Trump about Jeffrey Epstein; the materials instead include internal FBI memos about holdings, DOJ releases of other interview transcripts such as Maxwell’s, and email exchanges that reference Trump ^{[2] [5] [4]}. An internal FBI memo from July 2025 described extensive holdings and evidence review but did not list any Trump interview transcript; contemporaneous media live‑coverage pages and fact‑checks similarly report that no verifiable FBI interview record involving Trump has been produced to date ^{[2] [7] [1]}.

3. Where confusion and gaps in the public record produce misinformation risks

The public record includes procedural notes—such as the FBI being instructed to flag documents mentioning President Trump—which are easily misinterpreted as evidence of an interview; flagging is a record‑management technique and does not imply an interview occurred or produced transcripted notes ^[3]. Additionally, the Justice Department’s selective release of transcripts (for example, Maxwell’s interviews) and the high volume of emails mentioning influential names create an appearance of substantive investigative contact where only peripheral references may exist, which fuels claims that overstate what the documents substantiate ^{[5] [4]}.

4. How different outlets and actors present the issue and what agendas may shape coverage

Mainstream news organizations and fact‑checks consistently report the absence of any publicly released FBI interview transcript of Trump while emphasizing the presence of emails and flagged records; these outlets highlight procedural findings and released DOJ transcripts of other figures to provide context ^{[1] [5]}. Political actors on both sides may exploit ambiguity: critics of official transparency frame the lack of a public transcript as a cover‑up, while defenders emphasize the absence of evidence that an interview occurred; both positions selectively emphasize parts of released files, so readers should note that procedural mentions and email references are being used as political leverage ^{[3] [4]}.

5. Bottom line and what would change the conclusion

Based on the reviewed documents and reporting, the conclusive public finding is that no FBI interview transcripts or FBI notes documenting an interview of Donald Trump about Jeffrey Epstein have been released; the record contains emails, third‑party interviews, DOJ transcripts of other witnesses, and an FBI directive to flag mentions of Trump, but not a Trump interview transcript ^{[1] [2] [5]}. The situation would change only if the FBI or DOJ publicly released an explicit interview transcript or interview notes naming Trump as the interviewee; until such a document is produced and verified, claims that such transcripts exist remain unsubstantiated in the public record ^{[7] [3]}.