What federal prosecutions of ICE personnel for sexual misconduct have been filed since 2023, and what were their outcomes?

Checked on January 20, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Federal reporting and watchdog investigations since 2023 document hundreds of allegations of sexual abuse, coerced sexual contact, and harassment in ICE custody, and ICE publicly asserts a “zero tolerance” policy and new SAAPI directives, but the set of sources provided contains no clear record of federal criminal prosecutions of ICE personnel for sexual misconduct filed since 2023 or their case-level outcomes [1] [2] [3]. Reporting instead chronicles systemic reporting gaps, agency reviews, and activist calls for prosecutions and transparency, leaving the prosecutorial picture in these sources unclear [4] [5].

1. Allegations and systemic reporting gaps: scope but not prosecutions

Investigations and compilations by journalists and advocacy groups document large numbers of complaints: a nonprofit counted more than a thousand sexual-abuse/assault complaints plus hundreds more alleging coerced sexual contact, sexual harassment, or other abuse in ICE custody, and a JAMA study examined patterns of sexual-assault allegations across ICE facilities through 2022 — all indicating a sizable problem documented into 2023 — but these sources report complaints and investigatory shortfalls rather than criminal indictments of ICE staff [1] [6] [3].

2. ICE’s public posture: policies, directives and a “zero tolerance” claim

ICE’s public materials emphasize adoption of PREA standards and a revised Sexual Abuse and Assault Prevention and Intervention (SAAPI) directive in late 2023, with the agency asserting zero tolerance and promising accountability for sexual misconduct, but those documents are policy statements about prevention, reporting channels, and medical responsibilities rather than case-level prosecution records [2].

3. Watchdog and reporting findings: investigations often “not investigated” or “ignored”

Pulitzer-affiliated reporting and PBS investigations found that many allegations were not substantively investigated or were handled in ways that survivors and advocates describe as inadequate, with Futuro Investigates and Latino USA documenting patterns of ignored complaints and limited accountability — reporting that points to enforcement and oversight failures that could explain an absence of public federal prosecutions in this sample of sources [3] [4].

4. Legal framework: criminal liability exists but enforcement appears uneven in reporting

Civil liberties groups note that sexual contact between staff and detainees is criminalized at the federal and state level, and advocates urge reviews to identify procedural obstacles that have inhibited prosecution of perpetrators in immigration detention; these legal frameworks establish the possibility of federal criminal cases, but the provided sources stop short of listing federal indictments of ICE personnel since 2023 [7] [5].

5. What the sources do show instead of prosecutions

Rather than federal criminal cases, the documents and reporting in this collection reveal internal agency reviews, calls for congressional inquiries, compendia of complaints, and agency policy updates — including reports of hundreds of allegations, internal DHS reviews showing systemic shortcomings, and advocacy demands for prosecutorial action — but none of these items in the provided reporting cite a specific federal prosecution of ICE personnel concluded or pending since 2023 [1] [8] [9].

6. Alternative viewpoints and accountability implications

ICE’s published position of SAAPI implementation and PREA adoption presents a reform-oriented stance that the agency uses to argue for internal corrective measures, while journalists, human rights groups, and senators’ offices contend enforcement and transparency remain inadequate and press for criminal accountability — a clash between institutional policy claims (ICE) and watchdog findings that should prompt targeted FOIA, DOJ, or inspector-general follow-ups to identify any prosecutions not recorded in mainstream reporting [2] [3] [9].

7. Bottom line and limits of this review

Based solely on the provided sources, there is abundant documentation of allegations, policy changes, and investigative critiques since 2023, but no source here documents any federal criminal prosecution of ICE personnel for sexual misconduct filed since 2023 or the outcome of such a prosecution; confirming whether prosecutions exist requires searching DOJ, U.S. Attorney press releases, federal court dockets, or additional investigative records beyond this source set [3] [2] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Have any U.S. Attorney offices announced indictments of ICE employees for sexual misconduct since 2023?
What DOJ or Inspector General reports exist on investigations of sexual misconduct by ICE staff after 2022?
How do PREA implementation and SAAPI policy changes correlate with prosecutions or disciplinary actions in ICE facilities?