How many defendants remain charged but not yet tried in the Feeding Our Future prosecutions?

1. The charging baseline: 47 defendants indicted

The Department of Justice publicly announced federal criminal charges against 47 individuals in connection with the Feeding Our Future scheme, framing the matter as a sprawling $250 million fraud that exploited federally funded child nutrition programs during the pandemic ^[1]. That DOJ figure is the clearest published starting point for counting defendants across the layered prosecutions and is the metric most news organizations cite when describing the scope of the federal case ^{[6] [7]}.

2. Trials completed and convictions confirmed — but reporting shows only some outcomes

Federal prosecutors secured convictions in the spring of 2025 against Feeding Our Future founder Aimee Bock and co-defendant Salim Said after a multiweek jury trial ^{[2] [3]}, and at least one other defendant, Abdimajid Mohamed Nur, received a 10-year sentence in November 2025 for his role in the broader scheme ^[4]. These results demonstrate that a portion of the initial indictments have progressed to verdicts and sentencing, but public accounts do not list every defendant’s disposition in a single consolidated source ^{[2] [4] [3]}.

3. Known upcoming trials: at least seven defendants scheduled for April 2026

Local reporting repeatedly notes that seven more defendants were slated for trial in April 2026, and defense teams have sought changes of venue and argued about fairness in Minnesota, underscoring that multiple prosecutions remain pending ^{[5] [8]}. Those published scheduling details establish a lower bound: at least seven charged defendants remain untried as of the latest coverage.

4. Why an exact remaining-count is not available in the reporting

Multiple sources provide snapshots — the original DOJ indictment count , individual trial verdicts, and schedules for specific upcoming trials — but none supplies a comprehensive, up-to-date roster reconciling indictments, guilty pleas, convictions, dismissals, or deferred prosecutions across all named defendants ^{[1] [2] [4]}. Differing local accounts and occasional higher aggregate figures in some outlets (for example, citations of “70 defendants” in some coverage) further complicate a straightforward subtraction because they reflect evolving allegations, parallel state inquiries, or reporting that conflates related matters ^[7].

5. Best-available answer and the prudent caveat

Based on DOJ’s announced indictment of 47 defendants ^[1], and the public confirmation that multiple trials have already concluded with convictions and sentences including the cases of Bock, Said, and Nur ^{[2] [3] [4]}, the reporting supports a conservative, verifiable statement: at least seven charged defendants remain untried and scheduled for April 2026 ^{[5] [8]}. A precise all-defendants “remaining untried” count cannot be credibly calculated from the available sources because there is no single, current docket summary in the reporting to reconcile who among the original 47 has pleaded, been tried, been convicted, been sentenced, or had charges resolved otherwise ^{[1] [2] [4]}.

6. Political and institutional context that colors the prosecutions

The prosecutions have attracted political attention and administrative shifts — including resignations in the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the appointment of new prosecutors to carry the case — which can affect scheduling and public reporting of who remains charged ^[9]. At the federal level, the White House has also highlighted expanded fraud enforcement resources in Minnesota, a framing that amplifies the case’s national profile and may influence how quickly remaining defendants are brought to trial ^[10].