Which incidents from George Floyd's criminal history reference firearms and what are the dates?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Three episodes in George Floyd’s documented Texas criminal record are routinely cited as involving firearms: an August 1998 theft/robbery tied to a firearm, an August 9, 2007 aggravated robbery in which prosecutors say a pistol was used during a home invasion, and a later 2009 conviction and prison term tied to that 2007 incident; reporting and fact-checking disagree about some details and the way those incidents have been characterized publicly [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. August 1998 — “theft with a firearm” / aggravated robbery cited in multiple secondary accounts
Several contemporary summaries and later compilations of Floyd’s Texas court history identify an August 1998 incident described as theft or robbery involving a firearm; articles and aggregators repeatedly date that offense to August 1998 and label it as aggravated robbery or “theft with a firearm,” and some report a short local jail term tied to related charges [1] [6]. These accounts are the most consistent single-date reference to a firearm in Floyd’s earlier record, though primary court-file citations are not supplied in these online summaries available here [1] [6].
2. August 9, 2007 — aggravated/armed robbery at a Houston-area home (victim statements about a gun)
Court summaries and multiple reports say an August 9, 2007 home-invasion robbery led to felony charges after witnesses told investigators Floyd and others forced entry and that a pistol was placed against a victim’s abdomen; several outlets that compiled court records describe the intruder posing as a utility worker and then using a firearm during the assault [2] [6]. That 2007 incident is the central weapons-related episode cited by prosecutors and media accounts tying Floyd to an armed robbery; discoverthenetworks and other synopses recount the pistol-applied-to-abdomen detail directly [2] [6].
3. 2009 — conviction and imprisonment tied to the 2007 robbery; reporting on a five‑year sentence
The 2007 incident culminated in later prosecution: reporting notes a 2009 conviction and a multi-year sentence related to the assault/robbery that originated in 2007, with some outlets saying Floyd “landed five years behind bars” for assault and robbery connected to the prior offense [3] [2]. Local Harris County court database summaries compiled by mainstream reporting also list felony robbery with a deadly weapon among convictions in the roughly 1997–2009 span, tying weapons allegations into Floyd’s documented criminal history in Texas [5].
4. How fact-checkers and mainstream outlets qualify the firearms claims
Fact-checkers and mainstream outlets flag two important qualifications: first, while courts do show a 2007 aggravated robbery conviction and earlier convictions that reference weapons, some widely circulated social-media claims inflate or invent other specifics — notably the viral story that Floyd “held a gun to a pregnant woman’s belly” is not supported by court records and has been debunked as exaggerated or false by PolitiFact and Snopes [4] [7]. Second, outlets that emphasize the weapons-linked convictions also note those convictions occurred years earlier in Texas and that Floyd had no comparable serious convictions after moving to Minnesota — a context many reporters argue is relevant to how his past is discussed in coverage of his 2020 death [7] [5].
5. Limits of the available reporting and where assertions diverge
Available secondary reporting consistently identifies August 1998 and August 9, 2007 (with a 2009 conviction) as the firearm-referenced incidents in Floyd’s record, but summaries differ on language (e.g., “theft with a firearm” vs. “aggravated robbery”) and on sensational details that fact-checkers say are unsupported by primary court documents; many articles quoting court databases or summaries do not publish the underlying charging instruments here, creating reliance on secondary summaries for dates and weapon references [1] [2] [4] [5]. Where sources conflict, fact-checking outlets prioritize the court record and caution against viral claims that add or embellish violent specifics beyond what prosecutors proved [7] [4].