How do police records and court documents detail George Floyd’s past convictions?

Checked on December 7, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Police records and news reporting show George Floyd had multiple arrests and convictions between the late 1990s and 2007, including theft-related convictions in 1998 and a 2007 aggravated robbery that led to a multi‑year prison term after a plea deal; biographical summaries and investigations differ on details and emphasis [1] [2] [3]. Fact‑checking outlets and major reference accounts note some widely circulated claims are inaccurate or exaggerated — for example, Snopes says a commonly shared meme mislabels a 1998 conviction as “armed robbery” when it was theft [3].

1. Records show a pattern of arrests and several convictions — not a single narrative

Local reporting, encyclopedias and public records compiled after Floyd’s death document numerous police contacts spanning decades and several convictions, with summaries noting “between 1997 and 2005, he was convicted of eight crimes” and that he “served four years in prison after accepting a plea bargain for a 2007 aggravated robbery in a home invasion” [1] [2]. Different outlets summarize the same court files in different ways: some list specific years and charges, while others present a condensed timeline emphasizing the aggravated‑robbery plea and subsequent incarceration [1] [2].

2. The 1998 conviction is frequently misstated; fact‑checks correct the record

A persistent claim circulating online described Floyd’s 1998 conviction as “armed robbery.” Snopes’ investigation found the period and the existence of convictions were “mostly accurate,” but emphasized the key correction: the 1998 case was a theft conviction, not armed robbery — a distinction that changes how the charge is commonly portrayed [3]. Sources that repeat the harsher label without citation reflect either sloppy aggregation or a political motive to vilify Floyd [3].

3. The 2007 plea and prison term are central in many biographies

Multiple biographical sources and profiles single out the 2007 case as the episode with the longest sentence: Floyd accepted a plea deal related to an aggravated robbery and served years in prison thereafter. Encyclopaedia Britannica and Wikipedia both note he “served five years in prison” (with other writeups summarizing as “four years” depending on counting and parole) after that plea, and they position that term as a turning point in his life history [2] [1].

4. Media compilations and tabloid sites amplified inconsistencies and sensationalized elements

Aggregators and tabloid outlets republished court snippets and local reporting in ways that inflated or conflated charges; some commercial sites compiled lists that presented arrest counts and charge names without clear sourcing, which created confusion for readers trying to reconcile the public record [4]. These compilations contributed to the viral spread of misleading claims — a problem Snopes specifically addresses [3] [4].

5. Major reference works emphasize context beyond criminal history

Encyclopaedia Britannica and longform biographies (including the Washington Post‑authored biography referenced in Britannica) place Floyd’s criminal record in the broader arc of his life, noting community ties, attempts at rehabilitation and roles he played after release, such as security work and mentorship — reframing the convictions as part of a complex life rather than a sole defining fact [2] [1].

6. Fact‑checking and source transparency matter; competing perspectives exist

Reporting differs not only in factual detail but in purpose: some outlets aimed to document full court histories; others sought to rebut online smears or to humanize Floyd. Snopes explicitly frames its piece to correct misinformation and to caution against conflating past convictions with the circumstances of his death [3]. Readers should treat sensational compilations that lack direct court citations skeptically [3] [4].

7. What the available sources do not detail

Available sources do not mention exhaustive, original court‑by‑court transcripts in this dataset; they offer summaries, fact‑checks and secondary reporting based on public records. For precise charge language, dispositions, sentencing dates and plea paperwork, readers should consult the actual court records in Harris County and other jurisdictions — those full primary files are not included in the materials summarized here [1] [2] [3].

Limitations and takeaway: public summaries corroborate that Floyd had multiple arrests and several convictions, including a notable 2007 plea that produced years of incarceration, but many online accounts mislabel or overstate specific charges (notably 1998). The clearest corrective in current reporting is Snopes’ fact‑check that corrects the “armed robbery” mischaracterization; beyond that, encyclopedias and biographies place those convictions within a fuller life story [3] [2] [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What specific past convictions are listed in George Floyd's police and court records?
How do public records show the timeline of George Floyd's criminal charges and case dispositions?
Which jurisdictions hold George Floyd's arrest and conviction records and how can they be accessed?
How have news organizations and official records reconciled discrepancies in reporting George Floyd's criminal history?
What legal and ethical limits apply to republishing details from George Floyd's criminal records?