Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction under appeal in 2024?
Executive Summary
Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2021 criminal convictions were actively litigated on appeal throughout 2024: the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard her challenge, upheld the convictions, and denied en banc rehearing, while her legal team sought Supreme Court review [1] [2] [3]. The appeal argued that a 2007 Florida non‑prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein barred the New York prosecution, a theory the appellate court rejected, and Maxwell later petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court before the justices ultimately declined to take up her case in October 2025, leaving the convictions in place [3] [4].
1. A High‑Stakes Appeal Put the Non‑Prosecution Agreement at Center Stage
Appellate briefing and oral argument in 2024 focused on a single legal theory: that Jeffrey Epstein’s 2007 non‑prosecution agreement in Florida precluded any subsequent federal prosecution of individuals allegedly involved in the same scheme, including Maxwell. Maxwell’s lawyers argued that the 2007 agreement granted broad immunity and that proceeding against her in Manhattan violated that deal and basic principles of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel. Appellate judges in the Second Circuit expressed skepticism during hearings and, after full briefing and argument, the court issued a published decision in 2024 rejecting that claim and affirming the trial court’s judgments, finding the NPA did not shield Maxwell from New York prosecution [1] [3]. The defense’s central legal theory failed at the appellate level.
2. The Second Circuit’s Written Decision and the End of En Banc Hope
The Second Circuit’s September 2024 decision (United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256) affirmed the district court on multiple grounds, including that Maxwell’s convictions were supported by the evidence and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable. Maxwell sought rehearing en banc, asking the full court to revisit significant questions about the reach of the Epstein NPA and related evidentiary rulings; the court denied that request on November 25, 2024, effectively closing the principal federal appellate door in New York [3] [2]. Denial of en banc review left only the Supreme Court as a path to reversal, setting the stage for a certiorari petition and highlighting the narrowness of remaining legal options for Maxwell’s team.
3. Supreme Court Petition and the Limits of Further Review
After the Second Circuit’s rulings, Maxwell’s lawyers filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, presenting the same core questions about the NPA and federal prosecutorial limits. The Supreme Court received the petition but ultimately declined to grant review, removing the final federal avenue for overturning the convictions; SCOTUS’s decision not to take the case was reported on October 6, 2025, thereby leaving the Second Circuit’s affirmance intact [3] [4]. With certiorari denied, Maxwell’s convictions stand as final in the federal system, except for any collateral or extraordinary remedies not grounded in the merits rulings already resolved by the courts.
4. How News Coverage and Official Records Tracked the Appeal Timeline
Contemporaneous reporting and court documents in 2024 chronicled the trajectory: Reuters reported arguments before a skeptical panel in March 2024 as the appeal proceeded; the Second Circuit issued its opinion in September 2024 and denied en banc rehearing in November 2024; later reporting and court notices documented the Supreme Court certiorari posture leading to the October 2025 denial [1] [3] [2] [4]. Government filings and Department of Justice sentencing records from 2022 provide the factual underpinning of the convictions and sentence that were the subject of appeal. Multiple independent outlets and court dockets aligned on the sequence and outcomes, producing a consistent public record.
5. What This Means Going Forward: Finality, Limits, and Unresolved Questions
Legally, the practical effect is finality: with appellate affirmance, denial of en banc rehearing, and the Supreme Court’s refusal to intervene, Maxwell’s federally imposed convictions and sentence remain in force [3] [2] [4]. Strategically, defense counsel exhausted the principal appeals based on the NPA theory and other procedural claims; any remaining avenues are narrow, typically involving collateral relief motions or clemency petitions, which carry high hurdles and do not undo established appellate holdings. Public debate about the Epstein‑era agreements, prosecutorial discretion, and systemic accountability continues outside the courtroom, but the judicial process resolved Maxwell’s criminal appeals through 2024 and into 2025 with rulings that preserved her convictions. [1] [2] [4]