Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What specific affidavits, witness statements, and exhibits did Virginia Giuffre attach to her 2020-2021 filings against Ghislaine Maxwell?
Executive summary
Court records and news reporting show that Virginia Giuffre’s 2015 defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell produced many documents that were unsealed in batches from 2019 through 2024 — including depositions, witness interviews, affidavits and exhibits — and additional materials were released in 2020 and 2021 [1]. Available reporting names depositions of Giuffre herself and of Maxwell among the unsealed items and describes thousands of pages ultimately made public, but the provided sources do not list a complete, line‑by‑line inventory of every affidavit, witness statement, and exhibit Giuffre attached in 2020–2021 filings [1] [2].
1. What the public releases actually were: court batches and depositions
When news outlets describe the documents made public from Giuffre v. Maxwell they emphasize that the material came in waves: about 2,000 pages were unsealed in 2019 and additional documents were released in 2020, 2021 and 2022, with still more unsealed in early 2024 [1]. Reporting explicitly notes that the unsealed troves included depositions — notably Giuffre’s deposition and multiple Maxwell depositions — plus interview transcripts and other discovery materials [2] [1].
2. What reporters singled out: depositions and high‑profile names
News accounts focused on a handful of high‑visibility items within the releases, such as Giuffre’s deposition testimony used in related suits (including against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz) and Maxwell’s sworn statements, and they flagged that the documents named many people connected to Epstein’s circle [3] [2] [1]. The media coverage stressed that the unsealed files contained witness lists and interviews that mentioned more than 150 people, but that naming does not equal proof of wrongdoing [1].
3. Limits of public reporting on affidavits and exhibits
Available sources repeatedly describe the volume and types of documents (depositions, witness interviews, exhibits) but do not, in the excerpts provided, publish a granular inventory of every affidavit, witness statement, or numbered exhibit Giuffre filed or attached in the 2020–2021 filings [1]. Therefore, a complete catalog of specific affidavits and exhibit labels tied to those particular filing dates is not found in current reporting [1].
4. Why some items stayed sealed and why unsealing was contested
The litigation history shows that many documents were initially sealed as part of discovery and settlement procedures; media organizations and plaintiffs’ lawyers subsequently litigated to unseal them, producing the staggered disclosures [1] [4]. Maxwell’s lawyers fought to keep material sealed while the Miami Herald and others sought access, underscoring the adversarial push and pull over what should be public [4].
5. How other filings intersected with the 2015 suit
Giuffre’s 2015 suit spawned related civil actions and depositions that were later used in separate cases — for example, depositions referenced in Giuffre’s litigation with Alan Dershowitz and documents cited in filings against Prince Andrew — and reporting notes that materials from those proceedings were among what became public [3] [2]. This overlap complicates efforts to isolate “the 2020–2021 filings” because courts, counsel and news outlets have been releasing portions of a larger discovery universe over several years [3] [1].
6. What journalists emphasize about substance versus names
AP and other outlets warn that many people named in the files were identified as potential witnesses or in investigative notes, not necessarily as perpetrators — a distinction repeatedly made in coverage to avoid conflating appearance in a docket with guilt [1] [5]. This nuance is important: reporters flagged the presence of high‑profile names but also reminded readers that inclusion in discovery does not equal involvement in criminal activity [1].
7. How to get the precise list you asked for
Because the supplied sources describe the releases but do not reproduce full exhibits and affidavit lists, obtaining a definitive, itemized list of every affidavit, witness statement and exhibit attached specifically to Giuffre’s 2020–2021 filings will require consulting the court docket and the unsealed documents themselves — the unsealed packet[6] from the Southern District docket and the appellate filings about sealing/unsealing are the primary sources [7] [1]. The articles make clear those court records exist and were released in batches, but the excerpts provided here do not contain the complete exhibit-level inventory [1] [7].
Limitations and final note: The reporting cited above documents the unsealing process, the types of documents released and notable depositions [1] [2] [3], but available sources do not provide the comprehensive, exhibit‑by‑exhibit list you requested for the 2020–2021 filings. To produce that exact list, consult the unsealed court filings and the Southern District case docket referenced in the news accounts [1] [7].