Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are global statistics on religious prosecutions for Muslims versus Christians?
Executive summary
Global figures in recent reporting show large, but very different, tallies for Christians and Muslims when researchers count “persecution” by various measures: Open Doors’ World Watch List estimates about 380 million Christians faced high-level persecution in 2024 (1 in 7 Christians) [1], while other research (and older syntheses such as Pew) has found Christians and Muslims are the two most widely targeted faiths across countries, with each facing high levels of restrictions and social hostility in many states [2]. Available sources do not provide a single, comparable global count of Muslims prosecuted versus Christians prosecuted; instead, NGOs and datasets report different metrics (numbers displaced, killed, or living under “high-level” persecution) and emphasize different regions [3] [4] [2].
1. Different definitions produce different headline numbers
Open Doors’ headline—“380 million Christians persecuted in 2024”—uses its World Watch List methodology and flags people facing “high-level” persecution or discrimination; that includes metrics such as displacement, abuse, and restrictions and is aimed at measuring vulnerability of Christian communities [1] [3]. By contrast, broader social-science work (for example, Pew’s decade study) measures government restrictions and social hostilities and reports that Christians and Muslims are persecuted in roughly the same number of countries (Christians in 143 countries, Muslims in 140 in that study), which is a different unit of measurement [2]. Therefore, seemingly conflicting global statistics often reflect differing concepts: numbers of individuals affected versus numbers of countries with high levels of persecution [1] [2].
2. Counting deaths and displacements yields narrower, country-focused claims
Some organizations and media pieces report casualty and displacement counts for specific conflicts or countries —for example, Open Doors and allied Christian-right groups report thousands of Christian deaths and hundreds of thousands displaced in particular contexts (Open Doors reported 209,771 Christians displaced and 54,780 physically or mentally abused in one dataset cited by a religious outlet) [4]. Independent data-aggregation projects (ACLED and others, as cited in BBC coverage of Nigeria) produce far smaller counts of Christian-specific targeted killings in certain periods (for instance, 317 deaths in 384 incidents where Christians were specifically targeted in Nigeria across a recent window) and note that many victims of political violence are Muslims as well [5]. These divergent country-level tallies underscore how choice of timeframe, geography, and attribution (faith-motivated vs. political/terror violence) shifts the numbers [5] [4].
3. Geographic concentration matters — violence is often localized
Open Doors’ World Watch List concentrates its top 50 countries where Christians face the most extreme persecution and reports that 310 million Christians live under “very high” or “extreme” levels in those countries; their narrative highlights Muslim-majority states, authoritarian regimes, and conflict zones as key drivers [3] [1]. Other reporting points to hotspots such as parts of sub‑Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia for Christian-targeted violence, but also emphasizes that Muslims and other minorities face severe repression in many places [5] [2]. In short, persecution is concentrated in specific countries and regions; global aggregates can obscure that geographic concentration [3] [2].
4. Claims about “which religion is more persecuted” are often shaped by source perspective
Advocacy groups focused on Christian persecution (Open Doors, Global Christian Relief, International Christian Concern, Christian Freedom International) produce detailed country lists and victim counts highlighting Christians [3] [6] [7] [8]. Academic and generalist social-research bodies (e.g., Pew) use more neutral comparative frameworks and have concluded that Christians and Muslims are persecuted in roughly the same number of countries, though prevalence and forms of repression vary by region [2]. The difference in emphases reflects organizational missions and methodologies; readers should treat each dataset as advancing a perspective shaped by its methods and objectives [3] [2].
5. Key limitations and what the available sources do not resolve
No single source among the provided reporting produces a directly comparable global statistic that counts prosecuted or persecuted Muslims versus Christians on identical terms; Open Doors offers a large global estimate for Christians but not an exact Muslim comparator in these materials [1] [3]. Pew provides cross‑religion country counts but not a global headcount of individual victims by religion in the same style as Open Doors [2]. Available sources do not mention a unified, methodologically consistent global dataset that allows a clean apples‑to‑apples comparison of “religious prosecutions” for Muslims versus Christians across all countries (not found in current reporting).
6. How to interpret and use these numbers responsibly
Treat headline figures as entry points, not definitive verdicts. Use methodological notes: ask whether a number counts individuals vs. countries, whether it measures deaths, displacements, legal prosecutions, social hostilities, or “levels of persecution,” and who ascribes motive (religious vs. political). Cross-check advocacy reports (Open Doors, ICC, GCR) with independent data aggregators and academic studies (Pew, ACLED where cited) before generalizing beyond the contexts those sources analyze [1] [6] [2] [5].
If you want, I can: (a) compile side‑by‑side summaries of the methodologies used by Open Doors, Pew and ACLED based on these sources, or (b) gather country-level snapshots (e.g., Nigeria, Iraq, Pakistan) from the same set of sources to show how the numbers diverge by place.