Has Donald Trump paid the judgments awarded to E Jean Carroll?

1. Why the question matters: enforcement vs. verdicts and the gap reporters probe

Judges and juries can award money, but collection requires either voluntary payment or legal enforcement; the cited coverage emphasizes ongoing litigation and appeals rather than completion of payment, which creates a factual gap between verdicts and actual receipt by Carroll. Sources note that Trump has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a jury finding and has engaged appellate processes over both the $5 million and the larger defamation awards, signaling active dispute over liability and remedies ^{[1] [4]}. The reporting makes clear that media accounts have focused on verdict amounts — the widely reported $83.3 million defamation judgment and the $5 million verdict — but do not document execution steps such as levy, garnishment, or transfer of funds to Carroll, leaving the practical collection question unresolved ^{[2] [5]}.

2. What the record shows about the $5 million award and escrow movements

News reports indicate a $5 million verdict has been central to filings in the case and that Trump at one point deposited that amount into an escrow account while litigation continued; however, the materials provided do not show that escrow funds were ultimately released to Carroll or that the payment resolved all claims ^[1]. Coverage highlights that Trump sought Supreme Court review to overturn the jury’s findings and that lower court rulings have been disputed, which is consistent with preservation of funds in escrow as a defensive procedural move to avoid contempt or enforcement while appeals run ^[5]. The available analyses and reporting therefore document intermediate steps and strategic filings, but they stop short of confirming a completed transfer of judgment funds to the plaintiff.

3. The $83.3 million defamation judgment: upheld but not shown as paid

A federal appeals court decision affirmed an $83.3 million defamation award against Trump for statements about Carroll, and multiple outlets reported the judgment and appellate outcome; these sources make clear the award was sustained on appeal but do not state that Trump has paid the judgment amount ^{[2] [3]}. Court affirmance tightens the legal obligation and limits avenues for further appeal, yet enforcement remains a separate phase where judgment creditors must pursue collection mechanisms if a debtor does not voluntarily pay. The articles document the appellate result and the sum involved, but they do not include follow-up reporting verifying whether collection actions — such as liens, asset seizures, or negotiated payments — have produced funds transferred to Carroll.

4. Competing narratives and potential agendas in coverage and filings

Reporting and legal filings show two competing narratives: one framed by Carroll and her legal team as definitive legal victories requiring payment, and another advanced by Trump and his attorneys as grounds for reversal or review, emphasizing procedural errors and constitutional arguments ^{[4] [6]}. Media outlets covering the disputes range in tone and emphasis; some highlight the magnitude of jury awards and upholding courts, while others emphasize ongoing appeals and the procedural posture that postpones enforcement. These differences reflect distinct institutional agendas — plaintiffs pressing for immediate enforcement and defendants using appellate avenues to delay or negate payments — and the available sources document the conflict without showing a conclusive cash settlement.

5. Bottom line for readers seeking a definitive yes-or-no

Based on the provided reporting and court summaries, the clear and verifiable fact is that no source in the supplied set confirms that Trump has paid the judgments in full to E. Jean Carroll; instead, the public record in these items documents awards, appeals, an escrow deposit of $5 million, and an affirmed $83.3 million judgment, but not the completion of payment or enforcement procedures ^{[1] [2] [3]}. For a definitive update on whether Carroll has received funds, further reporting or court docket entries showing payment receipts, release of escrow, liens satisfied, or enforcement actions completed would be required.