Are there other high-profile figures linked to Epstein with similar allegations?

1. Photos and contact lists: many famous faces, few proven crimes

Dozens of public figures show up in the troves of images and records released from Epstein’s estate and government files — examples cited in recent reporting include Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Steve Bannon, Larry Summers, Sergey Brin, Michael Jackson and others appearing in photographs or contact lists — but journalists and courts consistently note that presence in files or photos does not equal allegations of sexual abuse or criminality ^{[1] [4] [5] [2]}.

2. Court filings that contain allegations: Prince Andrew is the highest‑profile accused

The clearest, highest‑profile allegation emerging from court documents involves Prince Andrew, who has been named in civil filings brought by Virginia Giuffre and other witnesses and who has faced litigation and public scrutiny over claims tied to Epstein’s circle; those court records and deposition testimony are part of the unsealed files that name him in connection with alleged sexual encounters ^{[2] [6] [7]}.

3. Names in filings without new allegations: Clinton, Trump and others mentioned but not accused

Former President Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are repeatedly referenced in various documents — Clinton as a frequent associate who has denied wrongdoing and Trump in passages and an FBI tip cited in partially released material — but the bulk of reporting stresses that inclusion in a file, travel log, photograph or a witness statement is not the same as an allegation of participation in trafficking or abuse; some documents explicitly contain no new allegations against certain named figures ^{[7] [8] [9]}.

4. DOJ’s public posture and the limits of the released record

Federal prosecutors and Justice Department officials reviewing hundreds of thousands of pages have publicly stated they have not found evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals or that would lead to new criminal cases against high‑profile figures, while lawmakers and survivors have accused the DOJ of withholding materials — a dispute compounded by the fact that the vast majority of files remain heavily redacted or unreleased, limiting what can be proven or disproven from the public record ^{[3] [8]}.

5. Where allegations exist, legal outcomes vary

Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted for her role in recruiting and facilitating abuse, and some civil suits produced settlements and testimony alleging abuse involving specific figures; elsewhere, named celebrities and politicians appear in records with contemporaneous statements from victims saying they met them, but those encounters did not always form the basis of allegations or charges — reporting emphasizes numerous instances where acquaintances were mentioned without accusations of wrongdoing ^{[6] [2] [10]}.

6. Alternative narratives, political pressure and information gaps

The released files have become a political flashpoint — Democrats, Republicans, survivors and media outlets frame the same documents differently, with some arguing the DOJ is protecting powerful people and others warning that filenames and photos have been misconstrued as evidence; independent reviewers repeatedly warn that redactions and a tiny public release (less than 1% by some accounts) mean major uncertainties remain and that inference from presence alone is unreliable ^{[8] [3]}.

Conclusion: cautious answer to the central question

Yes — other high‑profile people are linked to Epstein in the sense that they appear in photographs, travel logs, emails or depositions, and a very small number (most notably Prince Andrew) face explicit allegations in court documents — but for most named figures the public record contains association without proven criminal conduct, and federal prosecutors have reported they have not uncovered evidence to substantiate widescale criminality or blackmail among prominent associates as of the latest releases ^{[1] [2] [3] [8]}.