Have trends in homicide offender racial composition changed significantly between 2015 and 2024?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows that the racial composition of known homicide offenders in 2015 differed from later years: FBI Expanded Homicide data for 2015 reported that when offender race was known, 53.3% were Black, 44.0% were White (race unknown for many) [1]. More recent compilations and secondary summaries for 2023–2024 show a more mixed picture: FBI/Statista counts report more White offenders in raw counts in 2023 (8,842 White, 6,405 Black) while rate-based summaries emphasize much higher per‑capita offending and victimization rates for Black Americans (e.g., offending rate 26.5 vs. White 3.5 per 100,000 in a 2024 summary) [2] [3].
1. National snapshot: numbers, rates and reporting sources diverge
The simplest accounting produces different impressions because sources report different metrics. The FBI’s 2015 Expanded Homicide Report gave percentages of offenders with known race — 53.3% Black, 44.0% White — but that statistic excludes a large “race unknown” category and is a percent of known offenders, not a per‑capita rate [1]. By contrast, Statista’s 2023 compilation of FBI figures lists absolute offender counts showing more White than Black offenders in 2023 (8,842 White vs. 6,405 Black), which shifts the headline if you look at counts rather than proportions conditional on known race [2]. Separate summaries that calculate offending rates per 100,000 population emphasize much higher Black offending rates (example: Black offending rate ~26.5 vs White ~3.5 per 100,000) and Black victimization rates far above White rates (20.6 vs 3.3 per 100,000 in a 2024 summary), which again changes interpretation [3].
2. What “change” would mean: composition vs. rate vs. count
Assessing whether trends “changed significantly” depends on whether you track (A) the share of offenders who are a given race among cases with known race (the FBI’s 2015 framing), (B) raw counts of offenders by race (Statista’s 2023 numbers), or (C) race‑specific per‑capita offending rates (the rate summaries). The sources show that (A) and (B) can point in different directions and (C) consistently highlights racial disparities in rates. The FBI 2015 share metric and the 2023 counts cannot be directly compared without accounting for missing race data and population denominators [1] [2] [3].
3. Recent trend signals: declines in overall homicide but mixed racial patterns
Broad crime reporting through 2023–2024 indicates declines from the pandemic-era rises — headlines saying homicides were on pace to drop back toward 2015 levels and that violent crime was down in 2023 — which affects both numerator and interpretation of racial composition [4]. Secondary sources for 2024–2025 report substantial city‑level declines in total homicides and overall lower homicide rates in 2023 compared with 2020–2021 spikes, but these sources do not provide a uniform, national time‑series of offender racial shares from 2015–2024 that would settle whether composition changed “significantly” [5] [4].
4. Data limitations and why they matter
All sources contain limitations that affect conclusions. FBI “race known” percentages exclude many incidents where offender race was not recorded, biasing share estimates [1]. Statista’s tabulations report raw counts but do not convert to per‑capita rates; because racial groups have different population sizes, counts can mislead about relative risk [2]. Aggregated online summaries (The Global Statistics) present rate calculations but are secondary compilations and may combine different data products; they emphasize disparities but are not the original federal datasets [3]. The JAMA/GBD study and BJS reports provide long‑range context through 2019–2023 analyses but do not cover the full 2015–2024 window in a single consistent series [6] [7].
5. Competing narratives and implicit agendas in reporting
Different outlets stress different narratives: rate‑based analyses focus attention on racialized risk and structural drivers of violence [3], while count‑based tabulations can be used to claim that White offenders are numerically predominant [2]. The FBI’s presentation of known‑race percentages may implicitly downplay the effect of missing data unless readers inspect the “race unknown” counts [1]. Be alert: headline claims about “shifts” in offender race often depend on metric choice and may serve policy or political arguments if not contextualized.
6. Bottom line for the original query
Available sources do not provide a single, consistent national time series of offender racial composition from 2015 through 2024 that reconciles missing‑race cases, raw counts, and per‑capita rates; therefore, “significant change” cannot be declared unambiguously from these materials alone. The documents show that 2015 percentages (known‑race basis) and 2023 raw counts give different impressions [1] [2], and rate summaries highlight persistent, large per‑capita disparities that remain salient through 2024 [3]. Any definitive claim requires harmonized FBI/BJS microdata—adjusted for missing race, population denominators and year‑to‑year reporting changes—which the provided sources do not supply.