Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How common are ICE mistakes in detaining US citizens?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows wrongful ICE actions against U.S. citizens are not merely anecdotal: watchdog and media analyses count hundreds of encounters in recent years, with a Government Accountability Office (GAO) analysis finding ICE arrested 674 potential U.S. citizens, detained 121, and deported 70 in one reviewed period (2015–2020) [1]. Other journalism and compilations put the number of Americans held by immigration agents in the low hundreds during the current enforcement period and document forceful tactics in some cases [2] — while DHS disputes characterizations that its operations are producing citizen arrests and says such reporting is false [3].
1. What the data say: documented arrests, detentions and deportations
The clearest government-linked tally cited in current reporting is the GAO-related accounting summarized by the American Immigration Council: between 2015 and 2020 ICE arrested 674 people whom the agency listed as potential U.S. citizens, detained 121, and deported 70 — numbers that point to measurable, if imperfectly tracked, mistakes [1]. Independent counts and reporting projects focused on the latest enforcement surge have also compiled hundreds of incidents of U.S. citizens being questioned, held or otherwise caught up in ICE actions since the administration change [2].
2. Patterns in the reporting: more than isolated anecdotes
Investigations and advocacy organizations argue these are not just one-off errors. ProPublica and other outlets documented weekly videos and complaints of force and of agents ignoring assertions of citizenship; regional reporting found dozens of Americans detained during raids and enforcement actions, including people held for hours or days before release [4] [2]. Civil-rights groups and some members of Congress have framed the incidents as part of a broader enforcement posture that creates “collateral arrests” and racial profiling risks [5] [6].
3. Government response and disagreement on scope
The Department of Homeland Security and ICE officials have pushed back, calling some media reporting “false and misleading” and insisting ICE does not arrest or deport U.S. citizens as part of targeted enforcement — asserting agents “do our due diligence” and that operations are highly targeted [3] [7]. Axios, however, reported both DHS denials and independent reviews that found multiple instances of alleged wrongful arrests, highlighting the dispute between agency messaging and outside reporting [7].
4. Why tracking is difficult: gaps, definitions and incomplete data
Multiple sources note that official tracking is incomplete and that counts vary by methodology. The GAO and academic or watchdog databases rely on partial records, media reports, court filings and social media, making totals uncertain and likely undercounts; the GAO warned ICE does not know the full extent of actions against people who could be U.S. citizens [1] [2]. Available sources do not provide a definitive, government-published tally updating all recent years; instead, researchers piece together cases from varied records [1].
5. Human consequences documented in reporting
Reporting catalogs concrete harms: individuals handcuffed and held for hours, people detained for days without counsel, at least one person held for years before release, and a number of alleged wrongful deportations that prompted litigation and congressional demands for investigation [8] [1] [9]. Advocacy groups and lawmakers argue such harms warrant new legal protections and oversight [6].
6. Legal framework and remedies cited by experts
ICE policy states it should not detain U.S. citizens and sets procedures for verification; legal analysts and immigrant-rights attorneys emphasize that if a citizen is arrested “by mistake,” the agency must release them and that rapid legal intervention can be critical [5] [10]. Several members of Congress have introduced or supported legislation to prohibit ICE from detaining or deporting citizens and to create penalties for unlawful detentions [6] [7].
7. Competing narratives and what to watch next
Two competing frames dominate current coverage: watchdogs, journalists and lawmakers citing hundreds of documented incidents argue there is a systemic problem of wrongful detentions and occasional deportations [1] [2] [4]; DHS and ICE dispute those conclusions and characterize much reporting as inaccurate, stressing their stated training and targeting practices [3] [7]. Follow-up indicators to watch are additional GAO or inspector general reports, outcomes of congressional investigations urged by lawmakers, and whether ICE or DHS publish comprehensive case-tracking that either corroborates or contradicts independent tallies [1] [5].
Limitations: available sources do not provide a single, up-to-date official tally for all years and rely on piecemeal datasets, media investigations and GAO findings; where the government explicitly disputes a claim, that disagreement is noted [3] [7].