How many felonies had Trump been convicted of?
Executive summary
Donald J. Trump has been convicted of 34 felony counts—each count is a New York state charge for falsifying business records stemming from the so‑called "hush‑money" case—a verdict recorded by the Manhattan District Attorney, affirmed in court documents, and widely reported across major outlets [1] [2] [3].
1. The core fact: 34 felony convictions in New York
A New York jury found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records, a conviction announced by the Manhattan District Attorney and reflected in the trial record [1] [2], and the count‑by‑count outcome was explained in contemporaneous reporting by NPR and other outlets [3]. Major summaries of the trial and its aftermath likewise describe the verdict as 34 felony counts for falsified business records related to efforts to conceal damaging information during the 2016 campaign [4] [3].
2. What “convicted” means here — sentencing and legal status
Although the jury’s verdict made him a convicted felon under state law, the sentence imposed in New York resulted in an unconditional discharge, a judge‑issued outcome that affirmed the conviction while imposing no jail time, fines, or further penalties—an unusual sentencing result highlighted in reporting from PBS [5]. Legal commentary and institutional analyses emphasize that the conviction itself is what creates the criminal record, even where practical penalties are minimal or nil [6].
3. Broader legal landscape: other cases, appeals, and immunity arguments
That 34‑count New York conviction is the single, documented felony conviction among multiple criminal matters that involved Trump; other indictments and prosecutions in state and federal courts have produced a mix of results, including dismissals or prosecutions put on hold, but the New York verdict stands as the one conviction cited across press accounts [7]. His legal team has pursued appeals and raised immunity arguments before higher courts, and reporting notes that the defense has sought to challenge the conviction on multiple grounds, including claims tied to presidential immunity; these legal battles have been raised in filings and subsequent press coverage [8] [7].
4. Political framing, media signals and competing narratives
The conviction has been wielded by political actors and institutions to different ends: state officials and critics emphasize the 34‑count verdict as evidence of criminality and as political contrast, while allies and Trump’s lawyers frame the prosecution as politically motivated and continue to litigate the outcome [4] [8]. News outlets and institutional statements differ in tone—official Manhattan DA materials present the verdict as the result of evidence and trial testimony [1], while some political communications and later coverage emphasize the unusual sentencing or seek to minimize its practical consequences [5] [6].
5. What the sources do and do not say — limits of available reporting
Contemporary reporting and the court press releases uniformly identify the New York conviction as 34 felony counts and document the sentence outcome [1] [2] [5]; these sources do not support assertions that other felony convictions exist beyond that New York verdict, and where outlets discuss other prosecutions they describe dismissals, dropped charges, or matters still on appeal rather than additional convictions [7]. If new convictions or final appellate reversals occurred outside the cited materials, those events are not reflected in the sources provided and cannot be asserted here.