How many US citizens have been wrongfully detained or deported by ICE since 2000?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting and public data sets do not provide a single, authoritative count of how many U.S. citizens were wrongfully detained or deported by ICE since 2000; ICE and DHS publish detention and removals by citizenship but do not summarize “wrongful” citizen detentions/deportations into a clean historical total (available sources do not mention a consolidated count) [1] [2] [3]. Independent projects and journalism document many individual cases and systemic data gaps, and researchers warn ICE data have undercounts and classification problems that complicate any attempt to produce a reliable cumulative figure [4] [5].
1. What the federal statistics actually show — and what they don’t
ICE’s public enforcement dashboards and the DHS OHSS monthly tables provide detailed counts of arrests, book-ins, bed usage and removals broken down by citizenship and criminality categories, and they are the primary official record for enforcement activity [1] [2] [6]. Those datasets allow researchers to count how many people of a given nationality were removed in particular fiscal years, but they are not presented as a cleaned dataset that identifies “U.S. citizens wrongfully detained or deported” across decades; that specific metric is not provided in the ICE/DHS standard outputs [1] [2].
2. Why “wrongful” citizen detentions are hard to total
Two separate problems block a straightforward cumulative number. First, ICE datasets are operational and focus on noncitizens subject to removal; they do not reliably label or flag later-determined citizen status in a way that would let someone sum corrected cases since 2000 [1] [2]. Second, independent scrutiny has found data quality issues at ICE — for example, a 2024 GAO finding highlighted undercounts in detention tallies — meaning even noncitizen counts can be incomplete or misclassified, complicating efforts to retroactively identify and count wrongful citizen cases from historical records [4].
3. What independent data and reporting add — and their limits
Advocacy groups and archival projects (for example, the Deportation Data Project) have assembled historical ICE records obtained through FOIA and other means, creating more usable time-series files for analysis spanning recent years; these sources are useful for identifying patterns and specific cohorts but do not claim to be a definitive register of every wrongful citizen detention since 2000 [5]. Major media outlets, including The Guardian and others, have used ICE biweekly and quarterly releases to track arrests, detentions, and removals in near–real time; those efforts improve transparency for recent years but still rely on agency-published classifications and thus inherit the same limitations [7] [8].
4. Documented individual examples show types of errors
Reporting and litigation show ICE sometimes attempts removals where citizenship is disputed or where the country of removal will not accept the person — examples include cases litigated in federal court and covered by outlets like NPR, which describe fights over deporting people to countries they never lived in or where documentation is lacking [9]. Such cases are evidence that wrongful or mistaken deportation attempts occur, but these reports document incidents rather than providing a comprehensive count [9].
5. How researchers could approach an estimate — and why it’s still tentative
A rigorous estimate would require (a) assembling historical ICE/DHS operational files (including any FOIA-obtained releases), (b) identifying cases later adjudicated or administratively corrected to U.S. citizenship, and (c) auditing for undercounts noted by oversight bodies [5] [4]. Several independent datasets and journalistic archives make parts of this work possible for recent years, but the absence of a federal “wrongful citizen detention/deportation” variable and data-quality caveats mean any cumulative figure would carry substantial uncertainty [5] [4] [6].
6. Competing interpretations and implicit agendas
Advocates and some journalists emphasize rising noncriminal arrests and aggressive deportation drives — framing errors against a backdrop of expanded interior enforcement — and cite ICE/DHS numbers showing many detained people have no criminal convictions [4] [10]. ICE and some policymakers stress enforcement metrics and the agency’s mandate to remove noncitizens who violate immigration law. Critics point to GAO findings of undercounts and to FOIA-based archives to argue official totals understate the problem [4] [5]. Each actor’s framing can reflect advocacy aims: transparency groups seek reform, while enforcement proponents emphasize order and removals [5] [4].
7. Bottom line for your query
Available sources do not contain a published, authoritative total of U.S. citizens wrongfully detained or deported by ICE since 2000; official ICE/DHS data enable partial investigations but must be combined with FOIA archives and case-level reporting to approach an estimate, and even then researchers warn of undercounts and classification errors that limit certainty [1] [2] [5] [4]. If you want, I can outline a step‑by‑step plan using the cited datasets and archives to attempt a reproducible estimate for a defined period (for example, 2010–2024) and list the likely sources of error you’d need to document.