How many women have accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking?

1. What the reporting actually says about numbers — “scores,” “hundreds,” and court files

Journalists and public-interest reporting about Epstein emphasize the scope of the case by referring to “scores” or “hundreds” of victims rather than publishing one agreed-upon total; for example, PBS summarized that thousands of pages of court documents include names and reference a large group of underage girls and “150 people who were in contact” with Epstein, and described the newly public records as revealing the magnitude of his trafficking operation ^[1]. Congressional and media releases around the 2025 partial unsealing note a large tranche of documents and continuing production by the Department of Justice rather than a neat victim count ^{[3] [2]}.

2. Why a precise number is hard to produce — legal, privacy and redaction factors

Oversight and DOJ releases explicitly note redactions to protect victim identities and that records are being produced over time, which hampers a single consolidated public tally ^[3]. Journalistic accounts and survivor advocates also emphasize privacy, legal settlements, and the sealed nature of many files — all of which mean publicly available documents will undercount or obscure the full universe of victims unless and until more records are unsealed ^{[2] [4]}.

3. How courts, settlements and lawsuits shape public totals

Much of what is public about Epstein’s victims comes from litigation — for instance, records released as part of Virginia Giuffre’s defamation suit produced thousands of pages that reporters used to describe the scope of the operation ^[1]. Those court-produced documents include names, depositions and transcripts but are not a complete census of every alleged victim, and settlements sometimes keep additional information sealed ^{[1] [3]}.

4. Survivors, advocacy groups and Congress are still trying to quantify and disclose files

Survivor-led groups and some members of Congress have pushed for full disclosure of the “Epstein files” to better document victims, identify enablers and allow law enforcement or researchers to compile a fuller count; recent coverage describes survivor projections and public appeals tied to House efforts to force broader releases ^{[2] [4]}. These efforts indicate that existing public documents are widely seen as incomplete and that advocates expect more names and records could appear if files are fully released ^{[2] [4]}.

5. Disagreement and political context that clouds the conversation

Media outlets and political actors have used parts of the release for competing narratives — some coverage focuses on who appears in Epstein’s emails (including allegations involving public figures) while survivors warn against politicizing their stories and urge transparency for accountability and victim support ^{[5] [4]}. The political battle over unsealing files creates incentives for both rapid release and selective framing, complicating attempts to reach a single, authoritative victim count ^{[6] [7]}.

6. Bottom line for readers seeking a single number

Available reporting and the government’s partial document releases do not provide a definitive, universally accepted count of how many women have accused Epstein of sex trafficking; instead, reputable coverage consistently describes the scope as extensive — “scores” or “hundreds” — and points to thousands of pages of documents and ongoing releases that could change public totals ^{[1] [3] [2]}. If you need an exact, legally verified headcount, current public sources do not contain one and official tallies are limited by redactions and sealed records ^[3].

If you want, I can compile the specific names and references that appear in the public tranche cited by PBS and Oversight (noting redactions and privacy limits), or track follow-up reporting from outlets releasing more detailed tallies as more files become public ^{[1] [3]}.