How many women have dropped sexual abuse lawsuits against donald trump

1. Known civil verdicts and ongoing appeals — the Carroll case as the clearest outcome

The most concretely reported civil proceeding resulted in a jury finding Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll and ordering $5 million in damages; that verdict was affirmed on appeal and remains the subject of Supreme Court-level briefing by Trump’s team ^{[2] [3] [4] [5]}. Reporting also notes a separate later award totaling additional damages tied to defamatory comments and ongoing appeals that together produced large judgments in Carroll’s favor ^{[4] [2]}.

2. Accusations, dropped suits and limited public detail

Multiple sources reference accusations dating back decades and note that some legal actions were dropped, dismissed or did not proceed — but they provide sparse, case-by-case detail. Wikipedia’s chronology cites a suit dropped on November 4, 2016, and notes disputes about why that unnamed accuser ended her claim; the article records that Lisa Bloom said the accuser dropped the case on her own accord, while commentators speculated about external pressure ^[1]. Other mainstream reports focus on active verdicts and appeals rather than creating a count of withdrawn suits ^{[2] [6]}.

3. Criminal charges vs. civil suits — different standards and reporting patterns

Sources emphasize that much of the public legal record against Trump consists of civil lawsuits (defamation, battery/sexual abuse) rather than criminal convictions, and media coverage tends to highlight jury findings, appeals and dismissals rather than enumerating withdrawn claims ^{[2] [6]}. For example, the Carroll civil trials produced jury findings and damages that have been appealed up to the U.S. Supreme Court petition stage ^{[5] [4]}.

4. Where reporting is explicit about dropped cases

Reporting explicitly documents some dropped or dismissed actions in broader contexts: a Wikipedia entry points to a specific suit dropped in November 2016 and discusses disagreement over whether it was voluntarily ended ^[1]. Separately, other DOJ actions unrelated to personal accusations — such as the Trump administration’s withdrawal of a civil suit against Southwest Key Programs over migrant child sexual-abuse allegations — are reported, but those concern government litigation choices rather than private accusers withdrawing claims against Trump himself ^[7].

5. Why a single number is hard to produce from available sources

Available sources do not compile a definitive list or tally of every woman who has filed then later dropped a sexual-abuse suit against Trump; press and legal summaries concentrate on major, litigated civil verdicts (Carroll) or on individual high-profile allegations, and they sometimes omit the procedural history of smaller or confidential claims ^{[2] [1]}. When accounts mention a dropped suit, coverage often includes competing narratives about motivation — e.g., an attorney saying a plaintiff withdrew voluntarily versus speculation about external pressure — which complicates any straightforward counting ^[1].

6. Competing perspectives in reporting

Mainstream outlets cited in these search results frame the Carroll verdict and appeals as central and factual (CNN, CNBC, PBS, NBC summarized appellate outcomes and Supreme Court petitions) ^{[6] [5] [2] [8]}. Wikipedia and investigative pieces note additional allegations and earlier dropped suits while also citing disagreements about why some claims ended, reflecting competing interpretations: plaintiffs’ advocates emphasize access to justice and potential intimidation, while Trump’s spokespeople call such cases politicized or frivolous ^{[1] [2]}.

7. Bottom line for your query

If your question seeks a precise number of women who “dropped” sexual-abuse lawsuits against Donald Trump, available reporting in the provided sources does not deliver a comprehensive tally; it documents at least one dropped suit in 2016 and focuses more extensively on the Carroll litigation and its appeals ^{[1] [2]}. To produce a reliable count would require a systematic review of court dockets, confidential settlements and press accounts beyond the documents presented here — material not included in the current sources (not found in current reporting).

Limitations: This summary uses only the supplied search results and does not attempt to verify or add information from other reporting, court records, or databases.