What specific training elements were shortened or removed from ICE academy curricula during the 2024–2026 recruitment surge?

Checked on January 28, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Reporting shows ICE compressed large parts of its basic training pipeline during a 2024–2026 hiring surge, with multiple outlets documenting a roughly halved academy schedule and the explicit removal of some coursework—most notably mandatory Spanish-language classes—while other claims (for example, that the academy was deliberately cut to “47 days” to honor the 47th president) are reported but contested or unclear in official records [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. The headline change: overall academy time was cut and split into two tracks

Multiple outlets describe ICE moving to distinct, shorter pipelines so it could deploy a vastly expanded workforce, creating a compressed eight-week track for Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers while retaining a much longer curriculum for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents—roughly 25–27 weeks—so the basic “academy” experience became bifurcated rather than uniform [1] [5].

2. What was explicitly removed: Spanish-language instruction and related cultural/communication modules

A repeated, specific change documented across reporting is the elimination of mandatory Spanish-language training for the accelerated ERO track; several accounts say this course was stripped from the compressed curriculum and that the agency has increased reliance on translation technology instead [1] [2]. Coverage ties that removal directly to concern about field communications and de‑escalation capabilities [1] [6].

3. What else was shortened: defensive tactics, legal and classroom time, and scenario training

Journalistic and expert accounts indicate the reduction was accomplished not only by dropping one language requirement but by compressing hours across the board—academic instruction, scenario-based training, and some defensive tactics blocks were truncated to meet timelines for rapid deployment of thousands of hires—though outlets differ on how many weeks each element lost [5] [7] [1].

4. The disputed “47 days” claim and how reporting treats it

Several stories repeated an anecdote that the academy period was cut to 47 days; The Atlantic and aggregated coverage reported that number and its ostensible symbolism, but fact‑checking outlets and other reporting say the precise figure is contested and that agency officials have pushed back on characterizations tied to a political tribute [3] [2] [4]. PolitiFact summarizes that training length “has dropped” but finds the exact quantification unclear in public records [4], while Snopes and others reported unnamed officials saying the program was trimmed to 47 days but also noted denials and ambiguity [2].

5. How ICE and DHS framed the changes—and what remains opaque

Coverage shows agency messaging framed the overhaul as necessary to meet statutory hiring goals and to quickly populate enforcement billets after the 2025 hiring surge, with ICE reconfiguring onboarding to “quickly deploy” agents [5] [1]. But agency‑level documentation accessible in public job postings and formal academy catalogs varies by date and location, leaving precise, consistently published lists of removed modules and minute‑by‑minute curriculum reductions hard to find in the reporting [8] [9].

6. Consequences, critics, and counterarguments

Critics and some members of Congress raised alarms that truncating language instruction and compressing scenario and legal training could impair de‑escalation and increase misidentification in the field; conservative voices that ordinarily support enforcement have also expressed unease about “militarized” rapid deployments [7] [10]. Proponents argue the split track preserves depth where needed (HSI) while getting more boots into frontline ERO roles quickly; reporting shows this tradeoff was deliberate but contested [1] [5].

7. Bottom line and limits of available evidence

The clearest, well‑sourced specifics are: ICE created a shortened ERO track (reported as roughly eight weeks), retained a longer HSI track (roughly 25–27 weeks), and removed mandatory Spanish instruction for the accelerated ERO curriculum; beyond that, reporting documents broad compression of classroom, tactical, and scenario hours but varies on exact durations and some sensationalized figures (notably “47 days”) remain disputed in public records [1] [2] [4] [5]. Public ICE catalogs and FLETC pages exist but, as assembled in current reporting, do not consistently list a universally applicable “pre‑ and post‑change” itemized syllabus for every cohort, which limits definitive, item‑by‑item confirmation [8] [9].

Want to dive deeper?
How did ICE justify dropping mandatory Spanish classes from the ERO curriculum, and what internal analyses supported that decision?
What training do HSI agents still receive that ERO recruits no longer get, and how do post‑academy specialty courses differ?
What independent audits or oversight reviews have evaluated the effects of ICE's 2025–2026 training changes on field performance and civilian encounters?