Fact check: What kind of firearms training do ICE agents receive in 2025?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, limited specific information exists about the exact type of firearms training ICE agents receive in 2025. The most concrete details come from sources documenting ICE's use of the Town of Islip's Rifle, Pistol and Archery Range under a five-year contract running from July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2026 ^[1]. ICE agents used this facility 33 times last year and 11 times so far this year for qualification and certification purposes ^[2].

The analyses reveal that ICE has an Office of Firearms and Tactical Programs that provides specialized training ^[3], though specific details about training content are not provided. Additionally, there is evidence of a secretive ICE program that trains civilians on firearms and surveillance ^[4], though this appears separate from standard agent training.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the controversy surrounding ICE firearms training. Local communities have expressed significant concerns about ICE agents training at public facilities like the Islip rifle range, with protests demanding an end to such arrangements ^{[1] [2]}. This community opposition represents an important perspective missing from the straightforward training inquiry.

The analyses also reveal a broader context of increased violence and danger facing ICE agents, with reports of an 830 percent increase in assaults against ICE law enforcement ^{[5] [6]}. This operational reality likely influences training requirements and intensity, though specific training adaptations are not detailed in the sources.

Another missing viewpoint concerns the reported increase in ICE use of force during arrests, including tactics like breaking vehicle windows ^[7]. This suggests that training may encompass more aggressive tactical approaches, though the connection between training content and field tactics is not explicitly established in the analyses.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears neutral and factual in its framing, simply seeking information about current training practices. However, the question's simplicity may inadvertently obscure the politically charged nature of ICE operations and training.

The analyses suggest potential bias in how ICE training is discussed publicly, with some sources emphasizing the vilification of ICE by Democrat politicians ^[6] while others focus on community concerns about militarization ^{[1] [2]}. The lack of transparent, detailed information about specific training protocols in the analyses themselves may reflect institutional secrecy rather than straightforward unavailability of information.

The question's focus on 2025 specifically may also be problematic, as the analyses primarily reference ongoing contracts and recent usage patterns rather than year-specific training modifications or updates.