Can ICE agents be trained in languages other than Spanish during their training program?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Yes — ICE training historically centered on a mandatory Spanish course for many new hires, but recent agency moves have scrapped that five‑week Spanish requirement and shifted toward field translation services and technology; the reporting shows opportunities for other-language use and informal on-the-job learning, but there is no clear, public, standardized FLETC curriculum committing to formal classroom training in specific non‑Spanish languages [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Historical focus: Spanish as the classroom default
For years ICE built a formal, five‑week Spanish Language Training Program into new‑hire curricula — a longstanding practice dating back to predecessor agencies and repeatedly documented in ICE materials and training brochures [5] [6], and reiterated in multiple career guides that list a five‑week Spanish course as part of basic training [7] [1].
2. The 2025 policy shift: cutting the Spanish course and leaning on translation
Reporting from mid‑2025 through late 2025 shows ICE eliminated the mandatory five‑week Spanish block to shorten onboarding, replacing it in rhetoric with “robust translation and interpretation services” and a promise of technology and on‑the‑job training instead of classroom Spanish [3] [2] [8]. Journalists and DHS statements note the agency’s claim that modern translation tools and broader interpretation services will address encounters with multiple languages rather than training new hires only in a Spanish dialect [3] [4].
3. Conflicting official materials and implementation gaps
Despite the announced change, ICE’s public career FAQ pages and legacy training documents still list the ERO Spanish Language Training Program as a required component for certain officer roles, reflecting either lagging website updates or uneven implementation across offices [1] [6] [5]. Investigations also found ICE had not yet purchased promised translation technology that was supposed to substitute for classroom Spanish, highlighting a gap between policy statements and operational reality [4].
4. Non‑Spanish language training — available, encouraged, but not uniformly institutionalized
General career guidance notes that proficiency in “Spanish or other languages” enhances an ICE agent’s effectiveness and is valued in hiring [9], and FLETC and ICE historically have offered specialized language and cultural courses at the academy complex [10]. However, the available reporting does not document a new, standardized multi‑language classroom track at FLETC that replaces the old Spanish requirement; instead the shift appears to favor technology, interpretation services, and local or on‑the‑job language supports [3] [4].
5. Practical reality for agents and the limits of public reporting
In practice, agents may still receive language support through local mentoring, online modules, contractor interpreters, or ad hoc training at field offices, and some tech (vendor‑promoted body cameras) claims translation across dozens of languages — evidence that non‑Spanish language assistance exists in tools and programs [2] [4]. The public reporting does not provide a comprehensive syllabus showing formal classroom instruction in specific non‑Spanish languages at FLETC post‑2025, so it is not possible from these sources to assert that ICE now offers structured, mandatory training modules for languages other than Spanish in its core academy curriculum [9] [2] [4].
6. Bottom line — a qualified yes, with caveats
The answer is: yes, agents can and do receive language resources and may be trained or supported in languages other than Spanish, but the institutionalized, mandatory five‑week Spanish course that dominated past curricula has been cut and replaced with a mix of interpretation services, technology promises, and localized/on‑the‑job training — and the evidence does not show a uniform, nationwide classroom program at FLETC that formally teaches a set of non‑Spanish languages as a direct replacement [1] [3] [4] [9]. Limitations in the public reporting prevent a definitive mapping of which specific non‑Spanish classroom languages, if any, are now standardized across ICE training centers.