Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What factors have contributed to the change in ICE agent salaries from 2020 to 2025?
Executive Summary
From 2020 to 2025, ICE agent pay rose as a product of blended federal pay policy changes, targeted law-enforcement pay adjustments, and increased ICE resource allocations that expanded hiring and special-rate eligibility. Key drivers include General Schedule (GS) across-the-board increases and locality adjustments, agency budget growth that enabled position and special-rate funding, and personnel-policy changes aimed at recruitment and retention for law-enforcement roles [1] [2] [3]. These factors interacted with regional market pressures, job classification differences across ICE components, and evolving retirement and benefit considerations that together produced the observed upward movement in reported average salaries between 2020 and 2025 [4] [5] [6].
1. Why federal pay tables and special law-enforcement rates moved the dial
The General Schedule increases and specific special-rate authorities materially affected ICE pay levels between 2020 and 2025. Annual or periodic GS base increases—like the 1.7% General Schedule adjustment effective January 2025—raised base pay across grades and served as a floor for ICE salaries; subsequently, special-rate determinations and law-enforcement special pay authorities layered above GS to address market differentials for front-line agents [1] [3]. These special rates are established after agency consultation and are explicitly designed to mitigate recruitment and retention shortfalls by creating higher pay ceilings for certain law-enforcement categories; the OPM announcement about upcoming special-rate adjustments for law enforcement underscores a policy trend toward using pay compression tools to keep federal law-enforcement pay competitive with state and local markets [3]. The cumulative effect of GS upward adjustments plus targeted law-enforcement increases explains a substantial portion of the nominal salary rise reported for ICE special agents in 2025 salary snapshots [4].
2. How ICE’s budget growth created room for higher pay and more positions
ICE budget expansions from FY 2023 into FY 2025 funded both personnel growth and operational priorities; increased appropriations enlarged hiring capacity and created discretionary room for retention incentives and locality-sensitive pay [2] [7]. Reports indicate ICE funding and Enforcement and Removal Operations staffing climbed markedly in recent years, which logically allowed the agency to allocate more resources to pay-related investments in recruitment and to fund positions with higher-grade responsibilities and locality pay differentials. Budget-driven staffing expansions often push average pay figures upward because newer hires can be slotted at higher pay grades or special-rate categories, and operational imperatives—such as countering fentanyl trafficking or expanding investigations—justify higher-grade positions. While budget growth by itself does not automatically raise individual pay, the combination of appropriations, position reclassifications, and special-rate funding contributed materially to the aggregate increase in reported average salaries between 2020 and 2025 [2] [6].
3. The role of labor-market pressures and geographic pay variation
Regional labor-market competition and locality pay differences produced variance in ICE salaries that magnified aggregate reporting of higher averages. ICE operates nationwide in high-cost labor markets where locality pay supplements meaningfully increase take-home pay; markets with acute recruitment challenges—urban centers and border regions—tend to trigger higher locality and special-rate adjustments [6] [4]. Private-sector and state/local law enforcement competition for investigators and agents exerted upward pressure in particular specialties such as HSI criminal investigators, where comparable civilian pay rose faster than standard GS tables. Salary survey snapshots in 2025 showing median ICE special-agent pay above earlier GS-based figures reflect both these market-linked locality effects and differential hiring in higher-paying job series within ICE [4] [6].
4. Classification, benefits, and retirement changes that affect total compensation
Beyond base pay, changes in retirement and benefits treatment influenced recruitment incentives and effective compensation, altering how agencies priced ICE work relative to alternatives. GAO analysis highlighted inconsistencies between standard Federal Employees Retirement System benefits and enhanced law-enforcement retirement packages, and legislative or administrative changes enabling enhanced benefits for certain categories increase the attractiveness of ICE roles and can affect pay negotiations and special-rate use [5]. Some agencies pursued non-pay levers—improved benefits or law-enforcement retirement eligibility—to address retention, while pay policy shifts were coordinated where possible. When benefit enhancements occur alongside pay increases, reported salary averages may rise indirectly as agencies reclassify roles or offer higher entry salaries to reflect total compensation competitiveness [5] [3].
5. Evidence limits, divergent data sources, and why reported averages differ
Available public datasets and private salary platforms produce divergent snapshots: internal OPM pay tables, agency budget reports, and market-based salary websites each capture different slices of compensation. For example, Salary.com’s May 2025 estimate of average Special Agent pay at $110,853 differs from Glassdoor compilations showing a broad internal spread across ICE job titles; these differences reflect sampling, inclusion of locality/special pay, and the mix of job series reported [4] [6]. Older career-advice pages from 2020 that cite GS entry ranges understate 2025 realities because they omit later GS increases and special-rate actions [8]. The most robust explanation for salary change therefore combines policy-driven GS and special-rate increases, ICE budget and staffing growth, market-driven locality adjustments, and benefit/retirement policy shifts—all documented in the referenced sources [1] [2] [5].