Were there any reported cases of ICE agents not wearing masks during Democratic administrations?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Reporting shows multiple instances in 2025 of ICE and other federal immigration officers operating with face coverings — a practice critics say rose sharply after the Trump administration took office and was uncommon during the prior Democratic administrations, according to former officials and news outlets [1] [2]. States and cities led by Democrats moved to ban or restrict masking by law enforcement, and judges and opinion writers have sharply criticized the practice [3] [2] [4].
1. Loose historical baseline: Democrats’ administrations and masking
Multiple reporting and expert statements indicate that routine face-covering by ICE agents was not common during the Biden administration and earlier Democratic administrations, according to former ICE officials and investigative coverage. Reuters reported that former top ICE policy staff under President Biden did not recall routine mask use while Biden was in office and that masks seemed to increase after the Trump administration returned to power [1]. The Immigration Policy Tracking Project likewise records that former ICE leaders said they did not see widespread masking during the Obama-era or Biden-era tenures and that the practice appears to have started or grown in 2025 [2].
2. Contemporary record: documented mask use in 2025
Numerous local and national reports from 2025 document ICE and other immigration agents operating with neck gaiters, balaclavas and other face coverings during raids in cities including Los Angeles, New York and New Orleans; images and video of masked agents sparked protests and local legislative responses [5] [6] [7]. Local outlets and direct eyewitness accounts described agents who “didn’t remove their masks” and refused to display badge numbers during some arrests [8] [7].
3. Why ICE and DHS defend masking — and the counterarguments
ICE and DHS officials have defended masking as a safety and doxxing-prevention measure for officers and families; ICE’s FAQs state officers “wear masks to prevent doxing,” and DHS spokespeople have repeated protection-of-personnel rationales [9] [10]. Acting ICE leadership has also said they will allow masks as a protective tool while arguing agents still identify themselves when masked [10] [9]. Critics — including local officials, judges and opinion writers — counter that the anonymity functions as intimidation, erodes accountability, and has been likened to “secret police,” a point made in an October opinion referencing a federal judge’s ruling [4] [2].
4. Democratic jurisdictions legislate limits; federal-state friction follows
Democratic governors and city leaders moved to bar or limit masking by law enforcement after publicized 2025 raids. California enacted a ban on most law-enforcement face coverings that explicitly includes ICE [3]. Los Angeles County supervisors advanced an ordinance to prohibit law enforcement, including ICE, from concealing their identities, invoking concerns about impersonation and community fear [11] [5] [12]. Federal officials and prosecutors have pushed back, noting federal supremacy and arguing state laws cannot bind federal operations [3] [12].
5. Impersonation problem complicated the optics
Federal bulletins and reporting flagged a rise in impersonation incidents in 2025 — criminals and copycats sometimes used ICE-like clothing and masks, which law enforcement said made the practice riskier for communities and complicated identification [13] [14]. The FBI and others warned that impersonators exploited heightened enforcement visibility, a fact cited by critics of masked federal officers who say visible ID would reduce confusion [10] [13].
6. What available sources do not mention
Available sources do not mention specific, documented instances of ICE agents not wearing masks during the Biden or Obama administrations beyond former officials’ recollections and retrospective comparisons; reporting is framed around the increase in masking in 2025 and contrasts these years with prior administrations on the basis of memory and photographic reviews [1] [2] [15]. They do not provide a comprehensive dataset tracking mask use across every operation in earlier administrations.
7. Bottom line and competing interpretations
The contemporary record is clear that masked ICE operations were widely reported in 2025 and that former Democratic-administration ICE officials and several news outlets say such masking was not routine under recent Democratic presidents [1] [2]. ICE and DHS defend masking as officer-protection; critics and many local lawmakers say it undermines transparency and fuels impersonation risks, prompting state and local legislative responses even as federal officials assert supremacy [9] [2] [3]. Readers should note the evidence rests on contemporaneous reporting, photos, eyewitness accounts and former officials’ recollections rather than a centralized administrative log comparing mask policies year-by-year [1] [2].