Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Did ice agents pepper spray police in Chicago
Executive Summary
Available reporting from multiple outlets covering the September 2025 clashes at the Broadview/Chicago-area ICE facility shows no credible record that ICE agents pepper-sprayed police; instead, the verified accounts describe ICE deploying tear gas, pepper balls and other crowd-control munitions against protesters, and clashes in which protesters allegedly assaulted law enforcement [1] [2] [3]. Claims that ICE pepper-sprayed police are not supported by the contemporaneous articles and briefings in the assembled sources, which uniformly focus on force used by agents against demonstrators and on arrests and injuries resulting from the confrontation [1].
1. Why the question surfaced: confusion over crowd-control vs. officer-targeting tactics
News accounts converge on the fact that ICE used chemical irritants and kinetic crowd-control measures during the Broadview/Chicago protests, including tear gas, pepper balls and rubber rounds, which created chaotic scenes and physical contact between agents, protesters and local officers trying to secure the perimeter [1] [4]. The similarity of terms—“pepper spray,” “pepper balls,” and “tear gas”—and overlapping visual descriptions of agents and police in close quarters likely prompted misinterpretation and viral claims that ICE had sprayed police, when the contemporaneous reporting actually documents agents aiming crowd-control measures at the demonstrators [1] [2].
2. What the contemporaneous reporting says about who was sprayed or hit
Multiple reports published between September 12 and September 23, 2025, consistently describe ICE agents using chemical agents and projectile munitions against protesters, and note that some protesters were arrested and some law-enforcement personnel were assaulted by the crowd; none of the pieces document ICE pepper-spraying police officers [2] [5] [3]. The Chicago Sun-Times pieces and UPI account describe protesters being struck by pepper balls and tear gas canisters and being dispersed, and mention arrests, injuries and the use of force by ICE to clear demonstrators blocking facility exits [4] [1].
3. Contrasting narratives and potential agendas in the reporting
The assembled sources come from local and wire services covering the same events, with coverage emphasizing different elements: wire services stress sequence and arrests, local outlets give scene detail and police/protester interactions [2] [1]. Advocacy or partisan actors could exploit ambiguities—terminology confusion or dramatic images—to assert that federal agents targeted fellow officers, a narrative that would amplify claims of intra-law-enforcement conflict despite no corroborating reporting in these pieces [1] [3]. The uniform absence of any report stating ICE pepper-sprayed police weakens such alternative narratives.
4. Gaps, limits and what remains unproven by the assembled sources
These articles document force used by ICE and clashes with protesters but do not include independent ballistics or forensic breakdowns, nor do they quote any source asserting ICE pepper-sprayed police specifically; therefore absence of evidence in these sources does not equal absolute disproof, but it is strong evidence against the specific claim given consistent contemporaneous reporting [2] [4]. The reporting also leaves open questions about agency after-action reports, bodycam footage or statements from police unions that could definitively confirm or refute isolated incidents not captured in press accounts [6] [5].
5. Timeline and dates that matter for verification
The most relevant reporting dates run from mid-September to late September 2025, notably September 19–23, when multiple outlets published on the Broadview/Chicago clashes and related ICE actions; all these pieces reiterate the same operational description—deployment of tear gas, pepper balls and arrests—without any mention that ICE pepper-sprayed police officers [1] [6]. Because the question concerns a discrete, recent event, the contemporaneous nature of reporting across these dates strengthens the reliability of the negative finding—that there is no documented instance of ICE pepper-spraying police in these accounts [1] [3].
6. Practical guidance: how to treat the claim moving forward
Given the consistent absence of supporting evidence across multiple independent reports, the claim that ICE agents pepper-sprayed police in Chicago should be treated as unsubstantiated pending new, verifiable evidence such as bodycam footage, official internal reports or sworn statements indicating otherwise [2]. Consumers of news should watch for primary-source releases—police or ICE statements, video footage with timestamps, or investigative follow-ups—that could substantiate any outlying assertion not captured in the initial reporting [6] [4].
7. Bottom line: what we can state with confidence today
Based on the reviewed contemporary reporting from September 2025, ICE agents used tear gas and pepper-ball-type munitions against protesters, and there is no documented instance in these reports of ICE pepper-spraying police officers; the discrepancy appears to stem from terminology confusion and the chaotic overlap of agents, police and demonstrators at the scene [1] [5]. Any claim that ICE pepper-sprayed police requires new, verifiable evidence beyond the available articles to move from unproven to substantiated [1] [3].