“ICE arrested an illegal immigrant selling counterfeit goods in New York”
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
ICE carried out targeted operations on Canal Street in October and November that it says focused on sellers of counterfeit goods; DHS/ICE statements and multiple news outlets report arrests of people described as undocumented and with prior arrests for counterfeiting, including a named suspect Abdou Tall [1] [2] [3]. The operations sparked large protests in Chinatown, local pushback about coordination with the NYPD, and disputes over who was detained and why — with reporting showing at least nine people taken into custody in one sweep and subsequent local disagreement about criminal records and citizen detentions [1] [4] [5].
1. ICE says the raids targeted counterfeit trafficking — federal account
ICE and DHS framed the Canal Street operations as “targeted, intelligence‑driven” efforts aimed at criminal activity tied to selling counterfeit goods; a DHS release described multiple arrests and claimed suspects had histories including counterfeiting and other offences, and ICE officials named specific individuals such as Abdou Tall as an “illegal alien … with multiple arrests relating to trafficking counterfeit merchandise” [1] [2]. DHS and Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin publicly emphasized criminal histories and said the operations were part of a broader crackdown on illegal activity on Canal Street [1] [4].
2. Local news and eyewitness accounts confirm arrests and protests but raise questions
Local outlets documented ICE and NYPD activity on Canal/Canal–Centre Streets and showed crowds and confrontations; amNewYork, The City, Hoodline and others reported that federal agents detained multiple people, that vendors scattered, and that protests followed the raids — including videos and eyewitnesses describing forceful detainments [6] [3] [7] [8]. Reporting also notes that at least nine people were taken into custody in one sweep, and that protesters and bystanders were among those detained, prompting widespread protests [1] [4].
3. Disagreement over records and whether local police handed suspects to ICE
DHS has said some suspects had prior arrests for counterfeiting and other crimes and has criticized local authorities for not transferring custody earlier; ICE claimed Abdou Tall was previously arrested on a counterfeit‑related felony in October and was not turned over to federal custody, leading to a later pursuit and arrest [2] [7]. Local reporting, however, shows the NYPD stating it had no role in the federal operation and that its own public messaging emphasized it did not orchestrate the raid; The City specifically reported it could not independently corroborate DHS’s account of criminal histories for some detainees [8].
4. Civil liberties and mistaken detentions are central local concerns
Multiple outlets documented community outrage after federal action, including claims that U.S. citizens were detained — one report cites a congressman saying four U.S. citizens were held for nearly 24 hours — and The Guardian and other reporting emphasize fear in immigrant communities and organizing by vendor‑rights groups [5] [9] [4]. Coverage also notes civil‑society responses: “know your rights” outreach and local portals to collect footage for oversight, highlighting a broader debate over enforcement tactics in a sanctuary city context [9] [5].
5. Misinformation and viral content complicate the narrative
Fact‑checking outlets flagged social media claims and viral videos tied to the Canal Street events; AFP’s fact check found at least one widely circulated clip purporting to show the NYPD arresting ICE agents was AI‑generated, underscoring the risk that doctored content affects public perception of who did what on Canal Street [10]. The presence of altered videos and conflicting firsthand clips makes independent verification of key moments — like the sequence of arrests and the precise role of each agency at specific times — more difficult for the public [10] [3].
6. Broader context: an escalation in ICE operations and political framing
National and local analysts place the Canal Street raids within a larger surge of ICE activity in 2025: data reporting and outlets like Axios and The New York Times say arrests have climbed and that many people arrested in recent federal sweeps have no prior convictions, prompting critics to argue that enforcement is driven by administration goals and quotas rather than strictly public‑safety priorities [11] [12]. Pro‑enforcement statements from DHS and ICE are explicitly political, framing the raids as restoring “law and order,” while advocates counter that the operations target vulnerable immigrant vendors and undermine local sanctuary policies [1] [11] [9].
Limitations and uncertainties: available sources document the DHS/ICE narrative, local protests, and reporting gaps about individual criminal histories; The City and others explicitly note they could not corroborate all DHS assertions about detainees’ records [8]. Sources do not provide a full, independently verified roster linking each arrested individual to specific counterfeit prosecutions, and some viral video claims about arrests of federal agents have been debunked as AI‑generated [10] [8].