Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How do ICE arrest numbers in 2025 compare to the Trump administration's average?
Executive Summary
The available reporting indicates that ICE arrest and detention activity in 2025 has risen sharply compared with recent years and is being described as higher than levels during the Trump administration, but none of the three pieces provides a precise, apples‑to‑apples numeric comparison to the Trump‑era average. The three sources describe a notable surge in 2025—characterized by large numbers of detentions, expanded roles for Border Patrol in interior enforcement, and increased funding for immigration enforcement—while also leaving gaps that prevent calculation of a definitive percent change against the Trump administration’s average [1] [2] [3].
1. What the reporting actually claims about 2025 arrests and detentions — numbers and tone that jump out
Each source frames 2025 as a year of expanded enforcement. VisaVerge reports 59,000 immigrants detained nationwide in 2025, described as a 50% increase from late 2024, and emphasizes that nearly half of those detained had no criminal records, signaling a shift in the target population and volume of interior actions [3]. The Guardian’s data‑driven piece catalogs a broader pattern of surges in ICE and CBP activity and places 2025 within a trend of intensified enforcement without producing a single comparative metric to the Trump administration average; it highlights agency tracking of arrests, detentions and deportations as evidence of an escalatory posture [1]. CBS frames the operational landscape differently by documenting Border Patrol’s expanded role inland, at times outpacing ICE in specific jurisdictions such as Chicago, which signals a structural change in how arrests are being executed even if a national numeric comparison is not given [2].
2. What’s missing: why the sources don’t offer a clean Trump‑era average comparison
None of the three pieces provides the underlying time series or methodological alignment necessary to compute a direct comparison to a Trump administration average. The Guardian offers aggregated ICE/CBP data reporting but stops short of presenting a single baseline average from 2017–2020 to compare against 2025 [1]. CBS focuses on operational shifts—who is making arrests and where—rather than headline national arrest totals, so it cannot be used to derive a nationwide numerical comparison [2]. VisaVerge provides a stark 2025 detention figure and a 50% year‑over‑year change from late 2024, but it does not contextualize that rise relative to 2017–2020 averages, nor does it disclose methodology for counting “detained” versus “arrested,” which complicates direct comparisons to Trump‑era statistics [3]. These definitional and time‑frame gaps prevent a single, validated ratio or percent change against the Trump administration’s average.
3. How to interpret the operational signals: volume, actors, and targets
Taken together, the reporting shows three convergent signals: increased volume of enforcement actions in 2025, a shift in operational actors with Border Patrol active inland and sometimes outpacing ICE in arrest activity, and a change in the profile of those detained, with a sizable share reportedly lacking criminal records [1] [2] [3]. These are complementary observations: VisaVerge’s detention totals suggest higher throughput in facilities; the Guardian’s aggregated data framing highlights a national uptick; CBS’s local reporting indicates enforcement is not only higher but has redistributed authority and presence geographically. These combined changes matter for interpreting whether 2025 is “higher than the Trump average” because the answer depends on whether one compares raw arrest counts, detention counts, or enforcement footprint and policy priorities.
4. Competing narratives and potential agendas in the coverage
Each outlet emphasizes different elements that can reflect distinct editorial or advocacy focuses: The Guardian’s numerical framing highlights systemic shifts and institutional tracking [1], CBS focuses on the practical implications of Border Patrol’s inland role and local consequences [2], and VisaVerge foregrounds the magnitude of detentions and budget expansion, noting many detainees lack criminal records [3]. These emphases can shape public interpretation: numbers alone can be read as evidence of escalation, while the composition of detainees and the redistribution of enforcement responsibilities can be framed as civil‑liberties concerns or as implementation of a broader policy mandate. Readers should note these differing lenses when weighing whether 2025 enforcement exceeds the Trump administration’s average.
5. Bottom line and what would be needed for a definitive comparison
Current reporting supports the claim that 2025 enforcement activity rose materially, but a definitive, numeric comparison to the Trump administration’s average cannot be established from the supplied sources because of missing baseline averages, differing definitions of “arrests” versus “detentions,” and absence of consistent time‑series data [1] [2] [3]. To resolve this would require a dataset that specifies annual ICE arrest and detention totals for 2017–2020 and 2024–2025, standardized definitions for each measure, and clarity about whether Border Patrol actions are included in the counts used for comparison. Until such harmonized data are published, the most accurate statement supported by these sources is that 2025 enforcement activity and detentions increased sharply and operational patterns changed, but the exact degree relative to the Trump administration’s average remains unquantified [1] [2] [3].